A ChemtrailsGeelong.com Article
The Greatest Swindle of All Time
The Holocaust Lie
"Let us beware of illusions: As long as people in the West believe in the six million and the gas chambers, they will always support Israel in principle, even if they criticise the Israeli treatment of the Palestinians as being unnecessarily harsh."
"If the holocaust were publicly exposed as a shameless fraud, if people all over the world learned that, while the Jews undoubtedly were ..... persecuted during the Second World War, there was no attempt to exterminate them, that the death factories, gas chambers and gas vans were a Jewish swindle, and that the six million figure was a fantastic exaggeration, the Zionist-led "New World Order" would be all but finished."
- Jurgen Graf, Historical revisionist-in-exile, 'Holocaust Revisionism and its Political Consequences', 2000
Travesty at Nuremberg
Do the war crimes trials prove the Holocaust narrative? Consider the following quotations from Nuremberg-contemporary authorities and other sources:
“The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence.... The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof.......”
- From the Charter of the International Military Tribunal (a.k.a the Nuremburg Farce)
"The initial war crimes trial was judged and prosecuted by Americans, Russians, British and French with, much of the time, effort and expenses devoted to whitewashing the Allies and placing the sole blame for WW2 upon Germany. What I have said of the nationalist character of the tribunals applies to the prosecution. The high ideals announced as the motives for creating these tribunals has not been evident. The prosecution has failed to maintain objectivity aloof from vindictiveness, aloof from personal ambitions for convictions. It has failed to strive to lay down precedents which might help the world to avoid future wars. The entire atmosphere here is unwholesome. Linguists were needed. The Americans are notably poor linguists. Lawyers, clerks, interpreters and researchers were employed who became Americans only in recent years, whose backgrounds were embedded in Europe's hatreds and prejudices."
- US Supreme Court Chief Justice Charles F. Wennerstrum, Judge at Nuremburg
- Thomas Dodd, Leading Prosecutor at the Nuremburg Trials
"I thought at the time and still think that the Nuremberg trials were unprincipled. Law was created ex post facto to suit the passion and clamour of the time. The concept of ex post facto is not congenial to the Anglo-American viewpoint on law."
- US Associate Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, Nuremberg contemporary
"The Nuremberg Trials have made the waging of an unsuccessful war a crime."
- Field Marshal Bernard L. Montgomery, 1948
"... a fantastic desecration of the ideals of Western Civilisation, and appalling miscarriage of justice... a misuse of evidence for vicious ends, all of which will someday be exposed as a shocking travesty of high legal and moral principles."
- Professor Henry M. Adams, Ph.D
“About this whole judgment there is the spirit of vengeance, and vengeance is seldom justice. The hanging of the 11 men convicted will be a blot on the American record which we shall long regret.”
- US Senator Robert Taft, 1946
"Chief US prosecutor Jackson is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg......I hate to see the pretence that he is running a court and proceeding according to common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas."
- US Supreme Court Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone
"He that is without sin, let him cast the first stone........"
"For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you......
- Lord Jesus Christ, John 8:7 & Matthew 7:2
Click here for Anthony Lawson's 'Holocaust Hate Speech and Were the Germans so Stupid? — Updated' (Or if that link is banned by the thought police in your neck of the woods try here instead.)*
Click here for 'The Nuremberg Trials and the Holocaust. Do the 'war crimes' trials prove extermination?' by Mark Weber
For much more from highly credible contemporary sources regarding the Nuremberg farce, click here.
No body. No murder weapon.
In the conclusion of the Anthony Lawson video linked above two highly pertinent questions are raised about the Nuremburg trials:
1. Was the evidence given by leading American forensic pathologist at the time, Dr. Charles Larson, that not one case of death by poison gas was found, overlooked or deliberately suppressed?
2. Was the evidence given by US War Department lawyer and investigator, Stephen F. Pinter, that there were no human gas chambers in any of the German camps, overlooked or deliberately suppressed?
Revisionist historian, Theodore O'Keefe elaborates further on evidence, provided by early on-the-spot US Army investigators such as Larson and Pinter and clearly suppressed at Nuremburg, in his excellent article, 'The Liberation of the Camps: Facts vs. Lies'. Here is an excerpt from the concluding summary of that article:
"The conclusions of the early US Army investigations as to the truth about the wartime German concentration camps have since been corroborated by all subsequent investigators and can be summarized:
1. The harrowing scenes of dead and dying inmates were not the result of a German policy of "extermination," but rather the result of epidemics of typhus and other disease brought about largely by the effects of Allied aerial attacks.
2. Stories of Nazi supercriminals and sadists who turned Jews and others into handbags and lampshades for their private profit or amusement were sick lies or diseased fantasies; indeed, the German authorities punished corruption and cruelty on the part of camp commanders and guards.
3. On the other hand, portrayals of the newly liberated inmates as saints and martyrs of Hitlerism were quite often very far from the truth; indeed, most of the brutalities inflicted on camp detainees were the work of their fellow prisoners, in contravention of German policy and German orders.
4. The alleged homicidal showers and gas chambers were used either for bathing camp inmates or delousing their clothes; the claim that they were used to murder Jews or other human beings is a contemptible fabrication. Orthodox historians and professional "Nazi-hunters" have quietly dropped claims that inmates were gassed at Dachau, Buchenwald and other camps in Germany. They continue, however, to keep silent regarding the lies about Dachau and Buchenwald, as well as to evade an open discussion of the evidence for homicidal gassing at Auschwitz and the other camps captured by the Soviets." [For the full article click here.]
For an excellent radio interview/discussion with Ted O'Keefe and Mark Weber of the Institute of Historical Review click here. (Note: This is Weber in his pre-compromise days.) The career liars at the Simon Wiesenthal Centre declined the invitation/opportunity to openly debate and try to refute the facts presented by the IHR pair in this radio broadcast to over a million listeners in the US in 1990. The real reason for the Wiesenthal Centre's policy of no-show, notwithstanding their lame excuses, is a chronic incapacity for anything but spin and rhetoric.
Actually, eyewitness testimony is not very reliable - a fact recognized by scholars and courts of law, as well as people of common sense, world-wide. In the hierarchy of evidence, so to speak, physical and documentary evidence always takes precedence over eyewitness testimony in a law court or in scholarly work, for obvious reasons; while the former is objective in nature, the subjective nature of the latter and the imperfection of the human memory on which it depends, makes it far more open to manipulation and distortion. And this tendency increases over time, not to mention with the presence of duress or incentive to see things in a particular way, both of which feature heavily when considering Holocaust testimonies.
It really is a testimony to the effectiveness of post war propaganda that so few people in the war-time "Allied" countries, Australia included, realize the practical non-existence of material or documentary evidence in support of essential narrative Holocaust allegations, while at the same time, so many harbour the deep impression that witnesses to alleged Holocaust crimes are far more numerous and far more credible than they really are. In fact, material and documentary evidence largely contradicts so-called 'eyewitness' Holocaust testimony, and many of the testimonies themselves are also contradictory (not to mention downright implausible or impossible) even from the same 'witness' reporting the same event on different occasions.
For readers who would like to investigate this further Jurgen Graf's highly readable and highly instructive article "Eye Witness Testimony of Homicidal Gassings in German Concentration Camps During World War II" is an excellent place to start. And Manfred Kohler's in depth treatment of the subject in "The Value of Testimony and Confessions Concerning the Holocaust"* is also a must-read.
Mass media propaganda is enormously powerful. It is a mistake to think we are above its influence if we have not turned it off altogether – the methods are so subtle and so psychologically insidious. Photographs or video can be shown out of context or sometimes so as to completely misrepresent what they actually depict. Pictures that depict the brutality, harshness and horror of war have a traumatising effect on our minds that render them vulnerable to manipulation and misdirection. Spin doctors and propagandists know this only too well. Cinema constructs scenarios that have never taken place in unscripted reality. And all this can be done with such expert manipulation of our emotions (the use of music is particularly powerful for example), that even a person in full possession of the facts of a matter can find himself being swayed in spite of them.
Consider the photo above. Do you really believe you know what it represents of reality? Actually that which we believe about the published images we see depends largely on the text that accompanies them and also on our own deep-rooted assumptions about things, our conjectures and our preconceived ideas. And these preconceived notions, to speak honestly, come to us largely from the mass media, and perhaps also from the so-called 'education' system. Now click the photo above for an explanation of it, this time based upon the facts.......
Consider the following quotations from Professor Norman Finkelstein, well-known Jewish-American political scientist and author of “The Holocaust Industry”. Keep in mind that Professor Finkelstein's parents were prisoners at Auschwitz and Majdanek and both survived the war:
"The Holocaust may yet turn out to be the greatest robbery in the history of mankind."
- 'The Holocaust Industry' p.138
"Much of the literature on Hitler's Final Solution is worthless as scholarship. Indeed, the field of Holocaust studies is replete with nonsense if not sheer fraud."
- ibid pg. 28
"Given the nonsense that is turned out daily by the Holocaust industry, the wonder is that there are so few skeptics."
- ibid pg. 32
“One of my father's lifelong friends was a former inmate with him in Auschwitz, a seemingly incorruptible left-wing idealist who on principle refused German compensation after the war. Eventually he became a director of the Israeli Holocaust museum, Yad Vashem. Reluctantly and with genuine disappointment, my father finally admitted that even this man had been corrupted by the Holocaust industry, tailoring his beliefs for power and profit. As the rendering of the Holocaust assumed ever more absurd forms, my mother liked to quote (with intentional irony) Henry Ford: 'History is bunk.' ”
- ibid pg. 5
"Once ideologically recast, The Holocaust.......proved to be the perfect weapon for deflecting criticism of Israel."
- ibid pg. 18
“The Holocaust has proven to be an indispensable ideological weapon. Through its deployment, one of the world's most formidable military powers, with a horrendous human rights record, has cast itself as a 'victim' state, and the most successful ethnic group in the United States has likewise acquired victim status. Considerable dividends accrue from this specious victimhood — in particular, immunity to criticism, however justified. Those enjoying this immunity, I might add, have not escaped the moral corruptions that typically attend it.
- ibid pg. 3
It is a disturbing fact that in a world where it is permissible to question just about anything, including the existence of God, the authority of our Lord Jesus Christ, the wisdom of holy scripture and commandments, and even the validity of time honoured and wholesome life-serving institutions such as Family and Marriage, it is no less than illegal in many countries to question the official Holocaust narrative even on perfectly reasonable and logical grounds. And if it is not exactly illegal then it is frowned upon and punished in other less overt ways. So why the foregoing of otherwise (apparently) cherished western principles of free speech and freedom of thought on this one issue to the exclusion of all others, we ask? Think about it. Is it Truth that needs protection by the law from intelligent investigation, or a Lie? You decide.
“The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the state of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people (but not their leaders!) and the Palestinian people in their entirety.”
“I assert, in fact, that these famous alleged homicidal "gas chambers" are nothing but a tall story of wartime.”
"Whoever allows himself to claim that the alleged Nazi gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews are a historical reality is, whether he likes it or not, giving support to a horrid lie that has become the number one war propaganda weapon of the State of Israel, a colonialist, racist and imperialist State. Let whoever has the nerve to support the Holocaust myth look at his hands! His hands are red with the blood of Palestinian children!"
- Professor Dr. Robert Faurisson, French essayist and historical revisionist
Robert Faurisson's interview with Jim Rizoli 2015
Robert Faurisson - A Most Honourable Man (Anthony Lawson's Tribute.)
holocaust /ˈhɒləkɔːst/ destruction or slaughter on a mass scale, especially caused by fire or nuclear war
"The 'democrats', who claim to have 'liberated' the German people from Hitler, brought nothing but terror and destruction. In Dresden, they murdered several hundreds of thousands people in one single hellish night and destroyed countless cultural treasures. Women who were giving birth to children in the delivery rooms of the burning hospitals jumped out of the windows, but within minutes, these mothers and their children, who were still hanging at the umbilical cords, were reduced to ashes too. Thousands of people whom the incendiary bombs had transformed into living torches jumped into the ponds, but phosphorus continues to burn even in the water. Even the animals from the zoo, elephants, lions and others, desperately headed for the water, together with the humans. But all of them, the new-born child, the mother, the old man, the wounded soldier and the innocent animal from the zoo and the stable, horribly perished in the name of 'liberation'."
- Thomas Brookes, 'Dresden 13 February 1945, A Real Holocaust'
- Walter Scott
The following excerpt from a June 1944 secret memo of the British Ministry of Information to high-level civil servants, leading media figures and the higher British Clergy sheds extraordinary light on how public thought leaders are clandestinely conscripted by government into shaping public opinion on propaganda lines. (The same protocol is, of course, active today.) Note that only anticipated Soviet atrocities are referred to - the Ministry could hardly make explicit reference to equally anticipated British and American atrocities (such as Dresden) in a memo to all too often gullible public thought leaders who were, if not exactly well meaning, at least disposed to consider themselves as such.
"The only alternative to denial [of anticipated Bolshevik atrocities] is to distract public attention from the whole subject. Experience has shown that the best distraction is atrocity propaganda directed against the enemy. Unfortunately the public is no longer so susceptible as in the days of the "Corpse Factory" and the "Mutilated Belgian Babies" and the "Crucified Canadians [i.e. World War I propaganda lies]." Your cooperation is therefore earnestly sought to distract public attention from the doings of the Red Army by your wholehearted support of various charges against the Germans......which have and which will be put into circulation by the Ministry. Your expression of belief in such may convince others."
- H.Hewett, Assistant Secretary for the British Ministry of Information, June 1944
"Atrocity propaganda is how we won the war. And we're only really beginning with it now! We will continue this atrocity propaganda, we will escalate it until nobody will accept even a good word from the Germans, until all the sympathy they may still have abroad will have been destroyed, and they themselves will be so confused that they will no longer know what they are doing. Once that has been achieved, once they begin to run down their own country and their own people, not reluctantly but with eagerness to please the victors, only then will our victory be complete. It will never be final. Re-education needs careful tending, like an English lawn. Even one moment of negligence, and the weeds crop up again - those indestructible weeds of historical truth."
- Sefton Delmer, British chief propagandist to expert on international law Prof. Grimm, after the German surrender, 1945
"We made a monster, a devil out of Hitler. Therefore we couldn’t disavow it after the war. After all, we mobilized the masses against the devil himself. So we were forced to play our part in this diabolic scenario after the war. In no way we could have pointed out to our people that the war was only an economic preventive measure."
- James Baker, former US foreign minister speaking to Der Spiegel, 1992
Consider also the following commentary from two high profile British political/military figures of the WWII period:
"The devastation of Dresden in February, 1945, was one of those crimes against humanity whose authors would have been arraigned at Nuremberg if that court had not been perverted."
- Rt. Hon. Richard. H.S. Crossman, MP, British Labour Government Minister
"Adolf Hitler only undertook the bombing of British civilian targets reluctantly after the RAF had commenced bombing German civilian targets... Hitler would have been willing at any time to stop the slaughter. Hitler was genuinely anxious to reach with Britain an agreement confining the action of aircraft to battle zones."
- J.M.Spaight CBE, Principle Assistant Secretary of the British Air Ministry
Churchill's culpability for setting the hideous precedent in 1940 of targeting civilians in the war with Germany is, of course, conceded by orthodox historians of the Second Word War. For example:
"It may be Inconvenient History but England rather than Germany initiated the murderous slaughter of bombing civilians thus bringing about retaliation. Chamberlain conceded that it was "absolutely contrary to International law." It began in 1940 and Churchill believed it held the secret of victory. He was convinced that raids of sufficient intensity could destroy Germany's morale, and so his War Cabinet planned a campaign that abandoned the accepted practice of attacking the enemy's armed forces and, instead made civilians the primary target. Night after night, RAF bombers in ever increasing numbers struck throughout Germany, usually at working class housing, because it was more densely packed.'
- From 'The Peoples' War' by Angus Calder, 1969
"We managed to drag the United States into the First World War and if they [Britain] do what we demand in regards to Palestine and the Jewish armed forces, then we can get the Jews in the USA to drag the United States into this one too."
- Chaim Weizmann, Zionist, President of the World Jewish Congress and later President of Israel, September 1941
Simply, Germany under Hitler had become a dangerous example on the international stage, of an alternative, largely independent and highly effective system of national politics and economics.
"Therefore we will not establish our economic policy to suit the conceptions or desires of bankers in New York or London. Germany's economic policy is conducted exclusively in accordance with the interests of the German people. In this respect I am a fanatical socialist, one who has ever in mind the interests of all his people. I am not the slave of a few international banking syndicates. I am under no obligation to any capitalist group. I sprang from the German people. My Movement, our Movement, is a German people's Movement, and it is only to this German people that we are obligated."
- Adolf Hitler, Munich 24 February 1941
"Germany's unforgivable crime before the second world war was her attempt to extricate her economic power from the world's trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit."
- Winston Churchill to Lord Robert Boothby 1960
"Not the political doctrine of Hitler has hurled us into this war. The reason was the success of his increase in building a new economy. The roots of war were envy, greed and fear."
- Major General J.F.C. Fuller, British military historian
"The genie is out of the bottle. And I'm absolutely convinced, although for the moment we are in a very tricky, dangerous situation, that we have already passed the age of repression."
- The inimitable Ernst Zundel, civil rights activist and author, 1998
Below are some links to essential reading and viewing for those new to the subject of historical revisionism, and in particular those who never even knew there was another side to the Holocaust story – you may be in for something of a shock as to what the physical and documentary evidence actually indicates. In any case, if you value the truth, you need only resolve to do your best to ignore the almost ubiquitous antics of the Zionist propaganda and libel machine (Google, wikipedia etc...) that surrounds all politically incorrect views on the Holocaust subject, and let clear thinking and reason do the rest.
Here is a rule of thumb: if what you are reading resorts simply to calling people names while endowing its own views with dismissive, quasi-religious qualities that allow it to conveniently evade the need for evidential verification, such as 'self-evident', 'obvious', or 'common knowledge' and so on, then you are probably dealing with a fraud......
Suggested further reading
Robert Faurisson: essential quotations.
The Faurisson Archive.
The Gas Chambers: Fact or Myth? (Faurisson interview with 'Storia Illustrata'.)
'The Victories of Revisionism' by Professor Faurisson
holocausthandbooks.com (A huge collection of books and documentaries on the holocaust by revisionists worldwide.)
codoh.com (Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust) Click here for the website's 'What we do and what we believe page.'
'The Hoax of the Twentieth Century' by Professor Arthur Butz in pdf. Seminal book on the Holocaust hoax first published in 1976.
'The Leuchter Report' by Fred Leuchter. Myth-busting report on the alleged execution gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek, Poland by eminent execution equipment expert, based on on-site investigations and analysis.
'The Rudolf Report' by Germar Rudolf. Another expert report, this one from chemist Germar Rudolf, based on his 'scholarly impeccable' onsite analysis of chemical and technical aspects of the alleged "gas chambers" at Auschwitz. Surely the final nail in the coffin of the Auschwitz fraud.
Jurgen Graf: 'Holocaust Revisionism and its Political Consequences'
- Article 19, United Nations Declaration of Human Rights
"To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."
"That’s the thing about free speech that Doug Christie understood; it’s the gift that you have to give to your opponents, if you want it for yourself."
- Ezra Levant, Jewish-Canadian lawyer and broadcaster
Canadian defence lawyer Doug Christie spent much of his life defending the freedom of speech and thought of politically incorrect individuals with powerful enemies. Sadly he passed away in March 2013. At his funeral, Order of Canada winner Fr. Lucien Larre proclaimed him a saint for fighting "for what was right." "No matter the threats to his life", said Fr. Larre, "or the number of times his office windows were broken. He stood tall."
Below are some quotations from the "Battling Barrister".
“We have clear knowledge that if we don't do this we only get weaker, we only will get weaker tomorrow. This tyranny is growing. It's not diminishing. It is not something that is going to go away. There is no easy solution. There is no quick fix. We got this way over a long period of time being apathetic, indifferent and contemptuous of other people's problems saying I'm alright, to hell with you. You probably deserve to get all that bad press because you opened your mouth, right? That's what we say about most people who get in trouble. And it's so easy to do. And that process of looking after me too, what's that? Do you know what that is? That's isolation. And that's the first step to alienation and criminalisation. Cause if they can do that to you, they can do that to your neighbour, and gradually we all sit in fear in our homes waiting for our pension cheque wondering if someone's watching, whether we got more money than the last guy and whether Grant Bristow's next cousin is listening to our telephone. We live in terror.” [October 1997]
“I am only one, but still I am one. I cannot do everything, but still I can do something; and because I cannot do everything, I will not refuse to do something that I can do.”
- Doug Christie, Advocate of Freedom
Actually, there is a wealth of viewing on the subject of Holocaust revisionism to keep anyone who delights in truth (or as Prof. Faurisson prefers to put it, 'exactitude') over propaganda interested for days on end. The list that follows is but a small portion of that store, but may serve well as an introduction for those relatively new to the subject.
Off Your Knees, Germany! Ernst Zundel 1983 - 2003 (Full Video)
Robert Faurisson Documentary
Doug Christie YouTube Channel
Doug Christie: Thoughts on the Release of Ernst Zundel 2010
Doug Christie Free Speech is the Issue. Speech from Oct 16 1997 in Toronto
Short selected clips from the Douglas Christie Memorial Video Archive
David Cole: Jewish documentary maker exposes the fraud of Auschwitz
Bishop Richard Williamson on the Holocaust – 2008 (A Bishop of the True Church, so far courageous and resolute, despite persecution from both within and without the Catholic church...)
The Truth about Holocaust by Jewish Professor Domergue - Parts 1-3 (This links to part 1, you can follow the rest on YouTube. Or you can watch the interview in one unbroken part here.)
Sylvia Stolz "The Reality of Freedom of Expression" Full Speech, Uncut (Click CC for English subtitles.)
Sylvia Stolz 2013 "A Personal Reply" w. English Subtitles
Ursula Haverbeck: The Panorama Interview, with English Subtitles
Ursula Haverbeck on The Greatest Problem of Our Time (with English Subtitles)
The Great Holocaust Trial 1985 (FULL VIDEO)
The Revisionists - men & women of heart and soul (Tribute clip)
Other Recommended Reading
"None are so hopelessly enslaved, as those who falsely believe they are free. The truth has been kept from the depth of their minds by masters who rule them with lies. They feed them on falsehoods till wrong looks like right in their eyes."    - Goethe
1. Are we the unwitting slaves of a hidden hand?
Click for the article 'The Money Trap: Do I Need to be a Slave to Money? (Applying the Scientific Method to the Question of Liberty.)'
2. Are your desires being used to control and enslave you?
Click for the article 'The Sex Deception (A Young Man's Guide.)'
It's 1972. Eight men and women and a psychology professor walk into various psychiatric hospitals in the US pretending to be hearing voices. Immediately institutionalized by all the hospitals bar none they then return to their normal behaviour. Will any of the psychiatrists or nurses on the hospital staff spot the deception? What happens next will shatter any illusions you may have about psychiatry forever..........
"Any diagnostic process that lends itself too readily to massive errors of this sort cannot be a very reliable one."
- D.L.Rosenhan, psychologist
Psychiatrists: health professionals or thought policemen? You decide.......Click here for more.
“An antisemite used to be someone who hates Jews; nowadays an antisemite is someone Jews hate.”
- Gilad Atzmon, Jewish musician and author, 2011
"[Israel] is a vandal state.....Israel is Genghis Khan with a computer."
"...sometimes I feel that Israel has come out of the boils of the hell, a satanic state."
- Professor Norman Finkelstein, Jewish-American political scientist and author, 2009
"I think party donations and a program of giving trips to MPs and journalists to Israel.....it needs to be highlighted because I think it reached a very unhealthy level.”
“It’s an appalling situation if Australia allows a group of [Jewish] businessmen [in Melbourne] to veto policy on the Middle East.”*
- Bob Carr, interview with Sarah Ferguson (ABC), and *excerpt from 'The Diary of a Foreign Minister', 2014
Click here for the transcript of the Sarah Ferguson interview. Or here for the video.
Left: Two sides of politics, but both Bob Carr and Malcolm Fraser have publicly acknowledged the inappropriate and disproportionate power wielded by the Jewish community lobby in Australian politics.........
Consider the following excerpt from Zionist gatekeeper Jon Faine's interview with Malcolm Fraser in 2014:
Jon Faine (ABC): Bob Carr has managed to upset a lot of people here in Australia and overseas with his memoir, saying that he thought that the pro-Israel, in particular Jewish community lobby in Australia wielded too much power. What does Malcolm Fraser think of that?
Malcolm Fraser: They certainly do.....The Jewish community seeks to get Australia to support policies as defined by Israel.
- Malcolm Fraser, 'The Conversation Hour' (ABC), May 2014
Click here for an mp3 of the full interview (Note that the part referring to pro-Israel lobby influence starts at around the 45 minute mark.)
Israeli Deceptions Go South: Ex-Australian Prime Minister Confirms Israel Attacked America
Israel's Apologists: Anthony Lawson exposes the ABC's Zionist Gatekeeper Jon Faine