Meet America's Most Likely Victim of Midterm Election Fraud
November 2018
In light of recent events in the US, and in the hope that the best way to prevent a crime is by shining a light where it is most likely to occur, we feel compelled to announce here our pick for "most likely to be a victim of election fraud" in the upcoming US midterms: John Fitzgerald for Congress, 11th district, California.
We note that said candidate, who like his celebrated partial namesake has displayed something of the uncommon ability to think for himself, received a remarkable 24% of the vote in his district primary earlier this year despite being publicly disavowed by spineless Republicans in the days leading up to the vote. The result has earned him a shot, in a few days time, at ousting one of the many political prostitutes and opportunists currently cluttering up the floor of US Congress - incumbent Mark DeSaulnier(D).
Apparently DeSaulnier is calling for the National Republican Congressional Committee to publicly reject Fitzgerald's campaign in the wake of disturbing news out of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania in recent days, and subsequent calls from the usual sources for a crackdown on "antisemitism" and free speech. What DeSaulnier will not do, however, is agree to meet Fitzgerald in public debate, despite the latter's repeated invitations to do so.
One is inclined to wonder if those ultimately responsible for a litany of attacks on the peace of mind and sense of well-being of the American people in recent years are familiar with the fable of Aesop, "The Boy Who Cried Wolf". After all, a general pattern is by now discernible - a pattern which might just be the most compelling indication of who the perpetrators really are.
Left: the "pipe bomb" allegedly delivered to propaganda outlet, CNN. Middle: according to one former US Naval Explosive Ordnance Disposal Officer, cartoon-like depictions were the likeliest inspiration for the design of pipe bombs sent to political figures in the US last month. Right: A suspect, we hear, has been taken into custody. |
Meanwhile, the Pittsburgh shooting story follows hard on the heels of a series of parcels sent to high profile critics of President Donald Trump last month, including ex-CIA director John Brennan and notorious Jewish billionaire-cum-political-agitator, George Soros. The parcels reportedly contained what appeared to be crudely constructed pipe bombs, but serious questions have been raised as to their viability as exploding devices or even as devices that might have been reasonably believed to be a real threat to anyone, least of all the cast of clowns and otherwise dubious characters to whom they were sent. Of course, this shed quite a different light on the possible motivation for sending them. Needless to say the news coming out of Pittsburgh provided the mainstream media with a suitable and much needed substitute for what had been rapidly descending into the realm of farce.
Yet for all the media coverage regarding both Pittsburgh and the Prop-Bomber there has been relatively scant attention paid (particularly in the more politically sensitive former case) to the two forensic elements most worthy of consideration: first, the curious timing of both with respect to the imminent midterm elections, and second, the question of who might have reasonably believed they would benefit by them - cui bono? - surely the necessary point of departure for any serious criminal investigation.
We will not go into detail here, suffice to say that the timing factor does not sit easily with the notion of random acts of violence, while those groups implicitly or explicitly singled out for political culpability in the mainstream media and elsewhere (the so-called "far right" for instance) are clearly the least likely to benefit politically by ostentatiously engaging in ostensibly murderous activity. Indeed, by all accounts, those who might be identified as "far right" have been summarily and predictably penalised as a result.
Meanwhile the flagrant use of news stories, and particularly the one out of Pittsburgh, as weapons to be wielded by media and internet propagandists, political opportunists and Jewish lobby groups, for the purpose of disarming the Gospel or demonising anyone capable of effective and intelligent opposition, has been equally foreseeable. To not mince words (and with reference also to the two men taken into custody) the whole affair smacks of the hidden hand of a cunning provocateur, or yet another false flag operation or hoax.
Meanwhile the flagrant use of news stories, and particularly the one out of Pittsburgh, as weapons to be wielded by media and internet propagandists, political opportunists and Jewish lobby groups, for the purpose of disarming the Gospel or demonising anyone capable of effective and intelligent opposition, has been equally foreseeable.
 For example, we witnessed just such a pattern early last year when a spate of bomb threats against Jewish community centres and schools in the US, the UK, Australia, New Zealand and elsewhere were traced back to a US-Israeli father and son team working out of Israel. In fact, matters were only brought to a head by the entry of US federal agents into the fray after an "investigation" by Israeli authorities spanning two years proved curiously incapable of finding anything. Rather embarrassingly for international Jewry, the suspects were found to be Jewish.
While said father appears to have been cleared of complicity (presumably by the Israelis for what that is worth), his son, Michael Kadar of Ashkelon, now 20 years old, was convicted by an Israeli court in June this year of thousands of counts of extortion, dissemination of hoaxes and other crimes, consisting for the most part of violent bomb threats against Jewish targets around the world, but also including the possession and dissemination of pornography of a violent and "pedophilic" nature. (1) A picture has emerged for discerning observers (notwithstanding US and Israeli media spin and obfuscation) of an individual criminally and sexually compromised, more or less without conscience, knowing only as much as is given to him to know, and completely in the power of his handlers.
Kadar's father admitted his son had not been working alone. Describing the trial as "one big conspiracy" he pointed out that his son had taken "requests" to do what he did, for which he was paid handsomely in anonymous bitcoin. In fact, investigators have uncovered takings of hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of the cryptocurrency.
Readers may recall that CG reported the matter in March last year with a link to a Times of Israel article in which Kadar is conveniently described as an isolated figure, working alone in his bedroom with sophisticated cyber-camouflage technology at his disposal and struggling with subjectively diagnosed "mental health" issues; issues which we note have now morphed (according to same, but later modified Times article bearing the same headline and date - archived here) into a more ostensibly objective "non-malignant brain tumor". No doubt doctors have obliged the court with necessary documentation.
Above: US-Israeli man, Michael Kadar, in court last year facing charges related to thousands of anonymous bomb threats against Jewish targets around the world. His father has recently threatened to expose those who funded the operation. |
But perhaps the most significant information to come to light in the matter has surfaced only recently in a follow up sympathy-piece written for the Times in September (archive here) in which Kadar's father admitted his son had not been working alone. Describing the trial as "one big conspiracy" he pointed out that his son had taken "requests" to do what he did, for which the latter was paid handsomely in anonymous bitcoin. In fact, investigators have uncovered takings of hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of the cryptocurrency. "Nobody is asking who paid [Kadar]", he said, adding, "Everyone is satisfied with pinning the entire thing on [Kadar] and ignoring the fact that there are people behind every one of those requests."
It is not the first time that Kadar's father has alluded to conspiracy. In June he claimed in a court statement that, "there is a conspiracy here .... when the FBI checks who his customers were they will be surprised."
No doubt the implications regarding Kadar senior's own knowledge in the matter were not lost on some of those who made it their business to follow the trial. Indeed one wonders if the elder Kadar, himself a computer expert, had every reason to believe that his son would receive more lenient treatment in the case of exposure and arrest, and had perhaps even been given assurances to that effect, but the matter was complicated by international exposure of the story online, an unexpected change of political climate in the US at the end of 2016, and the wholly related shift in expectations of US authorities that ensued. He closes his recent interview in the widely circulated Israeli Times with a thinly veiled threat to unnamed powers, warning that "names" would be revealed in the "very near future".
The Kadar bomb threats were, of course, a false flag operation, but they were nonetheless effective in providing the pretext (at the time) for online sales giant, Amazon, to remove all books exposing the holocaust fraud from its available stockpile, just when sales of same were beginning to go through the roof and, indeed, to overtake the sales of those peddling the official holocaust narrative. Apparently some genuinely free market/free speech competition was not acceptable to those busy forcing their easily debunked atrocity propaganda down the throats of impressionable young children in our schools, while parents of same are forced to pay for the privilege.
Fact is, one needs only an elementary grasp of common sense psychology to understand that the seemingly never-ending assault on our minds and senses by news stories drawn from the pit of hell, will continue unabated until we cease to react to it in the entirely predictable ways desired by the perpetrators and the storytellers. Which means, among other things, turning off the spin and ending the monopolies that largely condition our response to it.
Finally, we note that Mr. Fitzgerald is one of the few candidates running in the US midterms this year (Republican and Democrat alike) with the courage and integrity to address some of the fundamental issues facing not only Americans (and particularly Californians) but also the world in general, including the impossible-to-overstate and relentlessly ongoing geoengineering atrocity/stupidity, the highly pernicious holocaust fraud and other aspects of the glaring and increasingly festering Jewish Question.
Needless to say, Mr. Fitzgerald is in our prayers this week.
Update: November 7th, 2018
The Pendulum
The pendulum swings,
back and forth, tick and tock,
one step forward, one step back,
promise made, soon forsaken,
real change wanting, small change taken;
the lesser evil or the greater,
never mind, we'll fix it later,
in name of progress or tradition,
or our favourite politician,
but most of all "democracy".
Until we put an end to darkness,
in the only Name that can ....
In memoriam
Robert Faurisson
Intrepid Champion of Historical Exactitude
1929-2018
"Many people told me: 'But Mr. Faurisson, you have a wife, you have children, you should care for them. It's the first duty of a man to care for his wife and children.' My answer is: 'Perhaps it's not the first duty of a man, perhaps it is the second one. Perhaps the first duty of a man is to be a man."
- Faurisson in conversation with Gilad Atzmon (here or here), Vichy, France, 10 June 2014
Above: "What proof do you have that this place was a gas chamber?" Faurisson addresses a crowd of visitors to the site of the Dachau concentration camp in April 1989; a site where it is now known no gassings ever took place. He later commented that he was "fully aware of the fact that at any moment [he] might be arrested on the spot and thrown into prison." |
We note with sadness the passing of French-Scottish Professor, Robert Faurisson, on October 21 at the age of 89.
Faurisson was a Professor of French literature at the University of Lyon II in his home country of France from 1974 until 1990. Previously he had taught at the Sorbonne for several years. He was also an expert in text and document analysis, a field to which he brought much that was his own.
He is, however, best known as a towering figure in the field of (historical) revisionism.
Revisionism, for those unfamiliar with the term, is the notion that historical narratives such as the "holocaust" for instance, ought to be based on factual and scientific considerations rather than political ones.
Faurisson's revisionist work came largely to the attention of the masses in the late 1970s when two of his letters, published in the French newspaper, Le Monde, outlined the research that had led him to the conclusion that the holocaust gas chamber narrative was based on "certain technical and physical impossibilities."
His arguments, which in the context of their publication in the widely circulated Le Monde amounted to a public challenge to orthodoxy, finally provoked a response in the same newspaper shortly thereafter, in the form of a declaration signed by no less than thirty four French professor historians. In fact the declaration had been drafted by only two: Léon Poliakov and Pierre Vidal-Naquet, both of whom were Jewish. A few years later Faurisson would refer to the latter with the altogether felicitous and self-explanatory epithet of "paper historian".
We have discussed elsewhere on this website the common resort of scoundrels and buffoons to empty displays of quantity as a cover for lack of quality; the response of said army of academics proved to be no exception to the rule. Their "declaration" is encapsulated in the following Orwellian excerpt:
“One must not ask oneself how, technically, such a mass-murder was possible. It was technically possible, since it happened. It is incumbent upon us to state this truth simply: there is not, there cannot be any debate on the existence of the gas chambers."
We will leave it to the reader to judge the merits of such a statement. In fact, for proponents of holocaust orthodoxy to have responded otherwise, that is to say, with substance and reason as opposed to dogma, is simply impossible, since the real substance of the matter is not helpful to their purpose, and reason is the favoured instrument of those who actually value the truth.
It is difficult to overstate Faurisson's contribution. In the 1980s, for example, he was one of the chief architects and planners behind the success of the Great Holocaust Trials, in which he served as researcher and tacit interrogative partner to "the Battling Barrister", the great Doug Christie.
At the time of said trials Faurisson was instrumental in the engagement of the then foremost expert on gas chamber technology world-wide, an American by the name of Fred Leuchter, for the purpose of personally visiting the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz and elsewhere and giving his opinion as to their technical feasibility. Leuchter was also instructed to take samples from the walls so that they could be tested in a laboratory for traces of cyanide gas.
This momentous initiative by Faurisson led ultimately to the publication of "The Leuchter Report" and also a little later, "The Rudolf Report", by German chemist, Germar Rudolf, formerly of the Max Planck Institute. Despite every effort by desperate exterminationists to downplay or dismiss them since, these two reports have proved utterly devastating to the official holocaust narrative fraud.(2)
Faurisson, whose qualities of steadfastness and determination were long ago attributed by his French father to his son's Scottish heritage(3), will be sorely missed not only in France where in recent years he surprised many by attracting an eclectic counter-culture following, but also all over the world where commitment to reality(4) and strength of character are still regarded as virtues.
The maverick Professor did not escape the penalty of his convictions however. Persecuted, prosecuted and shamelessly harassed until the end, including considerable fines, cowardly, physical beatings (despite his advanced years) and the usual slanders and mischaracterisations standing in for valid rebuke, he nonetheless maintained a perfect record of spirited and undaunted defiance, delighting and surprising many with his wry sense of humour, often on the very steps of all too familiar Paris courthouses, and even in the face of an opposition that almost beggared belief in its viciousness, vindictiveness and pettiness. Like his friend and colleague in the Good Fight, Ernst Zundel, he remained "unbowed" to the end.
He takes his place now in the annals of real history, alongside late friends Christie and Zundel, as a martyr to freedom of speech and his much commended "exactitude".
We honour his work here with some of his better known quotations, noting that they are as valid and insightful today as they ever were:
"Zionist power stems from the West's belief in the 'Holocaust' myth .... The Jews do not tolerate any questioning of the 'Holocaust'. Against the revisionists they use physical violence and judicial repression(5) because, on the level of historical and scientific argumentation, they have been defeated hands down by the revisionists. We have been able to expose their lies, one by one. Therefore Jews and Zionists seek refuge in violence and intimidation."
"As for the petty little world of journalism, the media demonstrates how it, more than anyone, is careful to traffic only in authorized ideas and wares; while at the same time it fosters, through its antics, the illusion of a free circulation of ideas and opinions - not unlike jesters in a tyrant's court."
"The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the state of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people - but not their leaders - and the Palestinian people in their entirety."
"Confronted by Revisionism, institutions likewise show themselves for what they are: products of circumstantial arrangements on which time has conferred an aura of respectability. The judiciary, for instance, claims to defend justice (a virtue!) or to uphold the law (a necessity), and would have us believe that, as a group, judges care for truth. But, when a judge finds himself obliged to try a Revisionist, how odd to watch as he jettisons the scruples he and his colleagues claim to honour! When faced with a Revisionist, there exists for a judge neither faith, nor law, nor right. In confronting Revisionism, the judiciary shows just how rickety it is."
"I like to watch the face of a man or a woman, an oldster or a teenager, as he or she trembles upon hearing, for the first time, the sacrilegious words of a Revisionist. With some, the face colours and the eyes light up: curiosity is aroused. Others pale; the person who believed in his own tolerance discovers his bigotry, and the one who had easily opened his heart quickly slams it shut."
"In the Western world, people have the right to challenge all religions, except the religion of the Holocaust. One may make fun of God, Jesus, Mohamed but not of what Simon Wiesenthal, Elie Wiesel and Simone Veil have had to say about the alleged genocide or the alleged gas chambers."
Professor Faurisson answers the questions of French film maker, Paul-Eric Blanrue. (With English subtitles)
The Revisionists - men & women of heart and soul (Tribute clip)
See also The Faurisson Archive* website, the collection of Faurisson articles in English at aaargh.vho.org and his updated bio page and tribute at Revisionists.com.
*Note: the Faurisson Archive website is available in both French and English - simply choose English when prompted for translation or right click on page and scroll down for English translation option.
Notes
(Click on the note number to return to its position in the article)
(1) the link provided is to the archived original article, which includes the following passage:
".... [Kadar's] hard disk contained child pornography for sale, including nude photos of underage girls, videos of underage girls being raped and sexual relations between minors."
The article has since been modified (soon after publication of the link on this website) to exclude the above revelation and to emphasise the subjective opinions of psychiatrists and other pseudo-scientists. A screen shot of the original article is provided here so that the latest censored version can be checked against it for further modifications.
An article from an alternative Israeli news source and similar time period (here) reports:
"Other offenses attributed to the suspect included the publication of false information to cause fear and panic, computer crimes, money laundering offenses, weapons possession, assaulting a police officer, mediating drug trafficking, providing means to commit a crime and possessing and disseminating pedophilic materials."
(2) "The Great Holocaust Trial" by American historian, Michael Hoffman, can be downloaded in pdf here. The latest edition of the "The Rudolf Report" entitled "The Chemistry of Auschwitz" can be purchased in book form here. (A documentary and pdf is also available at that page.)
"The Leuchter Reports", consisting of a compilation of reports by Fred Leuchter in book form, is available here. (Note: CG is not affilated in any way with any external websites.)
(3) A Scottish laddie is told the story of King Robert the Bruce in the cave as soon as he is able to understand the telling of it, if not sooner. The story was also told in here in a poem by Bernard Barton.
(4) albeit, in Faurisson's case, within strict, self-imposed limits of inquiry.
(5) Political prisoners, and freedom fighters, Alfred and Monika Schaefer are the latest to be given prison sentences in a German kangaroo court for thought crimes related to the Holocaust fraud. CG has referred to Monika before, but we reserve special mention here for elder brother Alfred, who by all credible accounts, has displayed exceptional courage throughout the trial.