Select videos on and off the Chemtrail topic
Full Length Documentaries on YouTube
(Click on the titles to watch.)
"What in the World are They Spraying?" a ground-breaking documentary co-produced by journalist and political activist Michael J. Murphy. By now everyone has seen crisscrossing streaks of white clouds trailing behind jet aircraft, stretching from horizon to horizon, eventually turning the sky into a murky haze. Our innate intelligence tells us these are not mere vapour trails from jet engines, but no one yet has probed the questions: who is doing this and why. With the release of this video, all of that has changed. Here is the story of a rapidly developing industry called geo-engineering, driven by scientists, corporations, and governments intent on changing global climate, controlling the weather, and altering the chemical composition of soil and water — all supposedly for the betterment of mankind. Although officials insist that these programs are only in the discussion phase, evidence is abundant that they have been underway since about 1990 [in the US] — and the effect has been devastating to crops, wildlife, and human health. We are being sprayed with toxic substances without our consent and, to add insult to injury, they are lying to us about it." (From the film's original promo material. Click here for the film-maker's website.)
5. "Dimitri Khalezov - The Third Truth"
Note: This video is constantly being taken down from Youtube for all kinds of spurious reasons, so the link must be continually updated. If the link above does not work try this one instead. Or if all else fails simply enter "the third truth khalezov" in a Google video search for the latest links.
The subject of 9/11, though not directly related to the chemtrails atrocity, is nonetheless related to it indirectly because so much of the political and psychological environment that we find ourselves in now, and which has made atrocities like chemtrails possible, is a direct result of what happened on that day in 2001. As such it is essential to have some idea of what really happened if we are to understand how something like chemtrails can be going on above our very heads without anything being done to stop it or even hardly anybody noticing it at all.
Khalezov is a former Soviet nuclear intelligence officer and as such was privy to details about a certain built-in and unconventional (to say the least) demolition scheme, that he claims was a part of, and a safety requirement for (according to the city building code of the day), the building of the two Trade Towers and also 'Building 7' - the latter collapsing more or less perfectly into its footprint at 5pm on the afternoon of 9/11, though no plane was ever even alleged to have hit it. Khalezov claims that said built-in, deep underground demolition scheme was well known to the Soviet nuclear intelligence community of his day because of a treaty on civilian use of nuclear explosions between the then USSR and the US which included an agreement to disclose to each other any such uses or schemes on their respective territories. On this inside knowledge, for which Khalezov is prepared to testify under oath in a court of law, a picture of what really happened on 9/11 emerges that manages to dismiss as absurd all the conspiracy theories related to the subject, including of course and especially, the most absurd of all - the official one presented by the 9/11 commission.
It is impossible to come away from a careful consideration of this video presentation without a sense that, with regards to what happened to the World Trade Centre buildings in New York on 9/11, Khalezov has more or less, give or take, hit the nail on the proverbial head. You can find his personal website here.
The documentaries, and the two TV ads included below, are all produced by the Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR), who have offices all around the world including Australia. Again, like Dimitri Khalezov's "The Third Truth" above, the content linked to below is not directly related to chemtrails but rather to the deplorable fraud known as 'psychiatry', and its corollary, the extremely lucrative psychotropic drug racket. Nonetheless it provides some insight into the dark forces that have been busy creating the psychological environment that makes such atrocities possible.
We should perhaps stress here that chemtrailsgeelong.com is not affiliated or connected in anyway with the CCHR, and we do not mean to imply by including the links below, and elsewhere on this website, that we subscribe to all of the views expressed by that organisation or its financial backers. We can and do however (to the best of our knowledge and for the most part), vouch for the CCHR content immediately linked to from this site, which is of an exceptionally high production standard, and more importantly, verifiable for serious researchers. Please keep in mind that the messenger is not important, but rather the message, and even then we need always apply discernment and critical thinking. Those that cannot discredit a message often attack the messenger or even set up their own messengers who can later be discredited, but none of this has any relevance for the intelligent researcher. Simply he asks: can the facts presented be verified? and what are the implications?
Australian Jan Eastgate, president of the CCHR, makes the following pertinent comment in her introductory message to the organisation's website::
“One of the most important things to know about psychiatry is the complete lack of science supporting its system of diagnosis or its treatments. Take, for example, the psychiatric “billing bible,” the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or DSM-IV. Not one of the 374 disorders described therein has ever been proven to exist by observable pathology or objective tests. Instead, a panel of psychiatrists arbitrarily defined symptoms of each mental disorder and then literally voted on their suitability for inclusion in the DSM. By this system, if a newly defined mental disorder loses the vote, it fails to make it into the DSM. The system is subjective and ambiguous; its terminology is ill-defined or altogether undefined.
In spite of such serious and fundamental flaws, this system is widely accepted as the benchmark for both judging human behaviour and determining treatments in courts, prisons and schools. In many countries [including Australia], the DSM forms the basis of mental health services billings to insurance companies and bogus “mental health screening.”
By medicalizing everyday problems, psychiatry has fraudulently labelled millions as mentally ill, and either forced or convinced them to adopt prescription psychotropic drugs as a routine part of their lives. As a result, psychotropic drug consumption has escalated with 100 million people
worldwide now taking these drugs, 20 million of whom are children.” (Click here for the full message.) [Emphasis mine]
The content linked to below is available free to view on Youtube. Again, click on the titles to watch.
“The definitive documentary on psychotropic drugging—this is the story of the high-income partnership between drug companies and psychiatry
which has created an $80 billion profit from the peddling of psychotropic drugs to an unsuspecting public." (From www.cchr.org)
"Diagnostic & Statistical Manual: Psychiatry's Deadliest Scam (2011)"
"Dead wrong: how psychiatric drugs can kill your child(2010)"
1. Click here for "The Bottom Line": a 3 minute crash course in psychiatry statistics to make your skin crawl.
2. "The psychiatry quiz": watch below right for eye-opening answers to questions like those below and more besides.
Question: Who commits more healthcare fraud?
A. Hospital Administrators?
B. Medical Doctors?
Question: Who involuntarily incarcerates the most citizens?
B. North Korea?
*See disclaimer here.
The professor's trick that exposed the ongoing psychiatry racket ....
It's 1972. Eight men and women and a psychology professor walk into various psychiatric hospitals in the US pretending to be hearing voices. Immediately institutionalized by all the hospitals bar none they then return to their normal behaviour. Will any of the psychiatrists or nurses on the hospital staff spot the deception? What happens next will shatter any illusions you may have about psychiatry forever..........
“The fact that the patients often recognized normality when staff did not raises important questions.”
"Any diagnostic process that lends itself too readily to massive errors of this sort cannot be a very reliable one."
- D.L.Rosenhan, psychologist
Psychiatrists: health professionals or thought policemen and quacks? You decide.......Click here for more.
1. Cliccate qui per lo spot "Morale della Favola": un corso intensivo di due minuti di statistiche psichiatriche che vi farà accapponare la pelle.
2. Fate il quiz psichiatrico: vedete il breve spot di sotto a destra per le risposte rivelatrici ed allarmanti a domande come quelle di sotto e altre ancora.
Domanda: Chi commette più frodi sanitarie?
B. Medici di famiglia?
Domanda: Chi incarcera forzatamente più cittadini?
B. Corea del Nord?
Vedete il video a destra per le risposte, e anche di più.
"You had half a million people in the streets of Dresden that night who had arrived in the previous day or two from Breslau, fleeing before the Red Army; whole families camping out in the open in the streets that night, when they were wiped out in the firestorm. There was nobody to report them as missing. If a hundred thousand people had been registered as missing with this missing person's bureau, the actual death toll is probably 150,000 or more. Entirely comprehensible. And "missing" means they are now just charred corpses lying beneath the ruins of the city*....." For more, see the video right.
*Actually "missing" far more likely meant reduced to a condition no longer even remotely recognizable as a body. Jewish propaganda (including wikipedia) would have us believe that only 25,000 perished in the bombing of Dresden, but this is based on the number of corpses that were recovered and identified and recorded as such - clearly a specious calculation. By way of comparison, consider that the death toll after the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima increased up to more than three times, to 130,000, in the months immediately following the blast, when "missing" persons were also taken into account(1). Keep in mind that 90% of Hiroshima casualties occurred in the first three weeks after the blast. In fact, in terms of fire ferocity and damage capacity, the Hiroshima atomic bomb was at least three times less potent than the overall equivalent unleashed on the civilians and refugees of Dresden on that one night in February 1945(2). Consider also that the firestorm that raged throughout that night is thought to have peaked at a temperature of 1500 to 1800 degrees Celsius (the road surface actually melted) and to have covered an area of up to 21 square kilometres(3), with the centre of the city as its epicentre. By comparison a cremation oven can reduce a corpse to a pile of unrecognizable ashes even at temperatures as low as 800 to 1000 degrees Celsius, in about an hour.
Or consider the death toll of "Operation MeetingHouse", the two day firebombing of Tokyo, also in 1945, in which at least 100,000 are thought to have perished and which was the result of conventional bomb tonnage (incendiary and explosive) less than half of that dropped on Dresden on just one night(4). We note further that the high population density of Tokyo is offset by the extraordinarily high concentration of refugees at the very epicentre of the Dresden firestorms, who are known to have numbered in the several hundreds of thousands. Many of these homeless refugees were camping out in the open in the streets and could not possibly have been more vulnerable. Clearly the methodology of counting only recovered bodies, identifiable as such, is a spurious one, and even those who propagate such despicable nonsense, cannot really take it seriously, truth be told. Unless of course it really is possible to be that stupid.
"I tell you these things because listen ladies and gentlemen, we are in an interesting battle, whether we realize it or not, in this world. It is a battle between life and death. What side are you on?"
"I know that I am in a government building and a beautiful one it is, and I love your country as well as my own, but I know in the age that we live in, it is not at all politically correct to say the name of Jesus Christ in places like this, to bring Him into these sorts of meetings, because His name can make people so terribly uncomfortable. But I didn't survive so I could make everyone comfortable. I survived so I could stir things up a bit......."
Right: Abortion survivor, Gianna Jessen, speaks at Queen's Hall, Parliament House, Melbourne 2008. Her speech has been aptly described as one of the the most powerful pro-life speeches ever given. In Gianna's native country of America, 50 million babies have been murdered since abortion was legalised in 1973. In Australia, one baby is murdered for less than every three that are born alive. In the video at right Gianna gives us the most compelling reason she can why this "silent holocaust" must come to an end: herself.
"My whole intent in living here is to make God smile. I hope some of this made sense. It just came from my heart......."
Phillip E. Johnson: Darwin on Trial
(From the article: "Darwin on Trial: Secular Materialism Under the Microscope". To read the article from the beginning click here.)
"If you ask these people: 'how do you know that mutation and selection, the Darwinian mechanisms, have the power to create complex organs', the answer they give will be some variation on 'well, everybody knows that, that's common knowledge, we settled that long ago.' All of these things that say: 'we've just decided not to think about that, but simply assume it.'
|Click to play: Phillip E. Johnson brings a sharp legal mind and wit to bear on Darwinian pseudoscience and evolutionist imperialism in the above interview. Click here for excerpts from the transcript of the video.|
"So that's what a lawyer brings to this - is the ability to recognize things like that and bring them out in the open. And that's of course why the outsider is so unpopular with the insiders, because the outsider is saying: 'look, here's where you went wrong. This is the assumption you made that was never established, and that because you couldn't establish it, you agreed to treat it as a fact among yourselves, and then to use your authority to prevent anybody from criticizing it......"
Other recommended viewing featuring Phillip E. Johnson:
Darwin on Trial - Phillip E. Johnson
Darwin on Trial (1 of 3) - Phillip E. Johnson [The Science Issues]
Darwin on Trial (2 of 3) - Phillip E. Johnson [The Philosophical Issues]
Darwin on Trial (3 of 3) - Phillip E. Johnson [The Cultural Issues]
Reason in the Balance - Phillip E. Johnson
Grand Metaphysical Story of Science Phillip E. Johnson
Intellectual Breakthrough - Phillip E. Johnson
Click to return to the article: "Darwin on Trial: Secular Materialism Under the Microscope"