Suggested Online Information Sources
The reference material listed below is just the tip of the iceberg. Please keep in mind that there is quite a lot of nonsense online too and it is often mixed in with the facts (sometimes deliberately), so keep your critical faculties active while you sort the wheat from the chaff, so to speak.
One example of this (more so a couple of years ago than now) was the mixing in of a whole lot of UFO nonsense with the chemtrails Geelong information - this is a textbook "intelligence" services disinformation exercise, do not be misled by it. Chemtrails have nothing to do with UFOs from outer space, though the actual criminal perpetrators would like us to believe so for obvious reasons. (Videos that turn up on You Tube have not necessarily been posted when they say they have - keep that in mind too.) Have no doubt about this whatsoever: chemtrails are the work of very much earth based jet aircraft acting out the orders of very much earth based cheats and liars. To believe otherwise is simply to be diverted from the truth - while we are busy chasing non-existent ETs and UFOs and other smoke and mirror effects from the "intelligence" services' bag of tricks, we are missing the real crime (which is a war crime) and its actual perpetrators (whose inhumanity is not so much a physical condition as a moral one), right before our very eyes. They are hoping we are the idiots they think we are. In fact they are staking everything on that. Let's disappoint them, shall we?
It is regrettable that there is so much disinformation online, but remember this – online you have at least a chance of getting the facts, if you keep your own brain turned on – but you won't get anything at all from mainstream outlets of information except misguidance and misdirection.
And that's a fact
For the article (in pdf) "Back To Word of Mouth – Powerful Interactive Learning versus Sophisticated Mind Control" click here.
For the article (in pdf) "Relating to Reality (And its importance to psychological soundness)" click here.
For the in depth article (in pdf) "The Sex Deception (A Young Man's Guide)" click here.
For the article (in pdf) "Do I Need To Be A Slave To Money? (Applying the Scientific Method to the Question of Freedom)" click here.
Derailment of freight train 6DA2: A Clear Case of Sabotage
Who is behind the Chemtrail atrocity?
Former Premier of British Columbia takes on Chemtrails
Just how much cleaner is Solar PV than Coal?
Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 (Excerpts from the US Air Force Document)
The Greatest Swindle of All Time
La più Grande Truffa di Tutti i Tempi
Psychiatry: Science or Fraud?
Wigington is intelligent and articulate and feels keenly the super-critical nature of the "hole-in-the-boat"/"house-on-fire" geo-engineering (and associated geo-climate) issue; all of which make him a compelling, edifying and impossible-to-dismiss communicator. Some of his recent presentations/talks in which he discusses the ongoing and criminally senseless exacerbation of an already bad geo-climate situation, by hare-brained climate engineering schemes, are must-sees.
Geoengineering. A Clear and Present Danger
Geoengineering and the Collapse of Earth
Dane Wigington in Sacramento - Is Climate Engineering decimating or weather?
Note: Wigington prefers the scientific communities' terms "stratospheric aerosol geo-engineering (SAG)" and "solar radiation management (SRM)", or even just simply "geo-engineering" and "climate engineering", to the popular layman's term "chemtrails", explaining that the latter is being deliberately associated online and elsewhere with the dismissive trigger-words "conspiracy theory" and associated ideas of insubstantial speculation and unsound thought.
Perhaps too though, we ought to keep in mind that the scientific community is the problem; it is after all the scientific community that has given us chemtrails and geo-engineering technology in the first place, and that is now a part of the criminal failure to disclose to the public the truth about their deployment, not to mention the pack of lies we are offered in place of the truth. It seems to me that our conditioned habit of equating the scientific community and their works and public statements with something akin to religious authority and gospel truth is part of the problem we now face psychologically regarding this issue, viz. our apparent inability to use our own eyes and minds to perceive the obvious. Clearly the distinction needs to be made in the collective mind between sound scientific principles available essentially to all (that is, objective inference from observation), and mere theory, rhetoric and lies that use the abstract idea of science and associated credibility as a convenient smokescreen.
Three clips of Allan Spencer's video footage of flights identified as Qantas flights QF63 and QF64 dumping on Greater Geelong.
“Chemtrail Terrorism over Geelong”
“Chemtrail and HAARP Terrorism over Geelong. 14th Oct. 2012”
“Chemtrails and HAARP Terrorism over Geelong 3rd Sept,2012”
A Kuala Lumpur to Christchurch flight hundreds of kilometres off it's usual shortest route course dumping it's chemical junk on unsuspecting Geelong people. Note the stop-start chemtrail indicative of an on/off mechanism - condensation trails, by definition, do not stop and start abruptly: “Air Asia Stop_Start Chemtrail over Geelong.”
Click here for a clip taken in the Northern Territory showing two planes in more or less the same sky space, one making an ordinary contrail, the other making something else entirely. There goes the absurd government/ASA "atmospheric conditions" explanation.......
For an excellent collection of high quality photographs of aerosols and derivative artificial cloud formations in the skies above Port Macquarie, NSW, and elsewhere around Australia and the world, visit BlueNoMore.com. The website author is an experienced pilot and, and in addition to the revealing photographs, provides interesting insight and technical information about the types of non-commercial military jets being used for chemtrail operations as well as mission-specific modifications, such as engine silencing.
He is perhaps now most well known in his native Canada, and particularly his own province of British Columbia (BC), for leading the successful fight (beginning in 2009) against the unpopular HST tax that the then Campbell government was seeking to steamroll through the parliament over people's heads. (Sound familiar?) Vander Zalm and his team succeeded in getting sufficient numbers on petitions for the matter to go to a referendum where a majority voted to abolish the HST.
In 2013 the former BC Premier decided to put some much needed weight behind the people's fight against chemtrails.
"My wife Lillian's been bugging me about this", he explained in an interview with Press for Truth in August 2013, "she watches the sky and she sees what obviously aren't contrails. I don't think there's anybody that has looked at the sky with a bit of brains, and thought in fairness, that could argue that something isn't happening that wasn't happening before. Contrails were something that followed the trail..... from an airplane, that were narrow and dissipated very quickly. Chemtrails go from horizon to horizon and they spread, and they criss-cross and they go next to one another and pretty soon the whole sky is cloudy." (1)
At around the same time, in an interview with Sheila Zilinsky (2), Vander Zalm pointed out the underlying factor that tied together chemtrails and other issues such as the HST (Harmonising Sales Tax) he helped to defeat, and the introduction of so-called 'Smart meters' world-wide for example, viz. the continual effort by government to side step the will and concerns of the people in issues that affect their lives in fundamental ways; ways that make the people's lack of input and/or the lack of any consideration of the people's welfare by government regarding same issues, not acceptable.
"I think the people are being left out of the process", the Premier-turned-Activist told Press for Truth, "Government has lost complete contact with the people. It's a mess. And the average person out there, if you asked him, "Do you really trust the government?", they'll say, 'No!', a whole lot of them, a large percentage....I think a lot of people have lost their trust in government, which is really sad, because the government is supposed to be there to represent the people. They're elected to do things on our behalf and to communicate with us. That's all gone." (1)
To Zilinsky he added:
"I can recall when I started in politics and that's now going back 40 years or so, when I started in politics the pay was alright, but it was relatively modest. Today politicians receive pretty big pay, lots of benefits and good pensions so therefore there is a tendency for the politicians to perhaps not be as outspoken on issues for fear that it might cost them their position within the political party that they represent, so it's very different from what it used to be........so the cost of government is so enormous and people are really fighting more to stay in there for the benefit of what it is they've been getting by way of indemnities and benefits and pensions than what it is to represent the people and the voice of the people." (2)
And in what appears to be a thinly veiled reference to underhanded tactics and abuses of power in politics (such as the media's misuse of their enormous influence on public opinion to 'remove' politicians found to be troublesome to controlling business and power interests), Vander Zalm raised, again to Zilinsky, what must surely be cause for some alarm to discerning readers/listeners when one considers his former political rank and experience:
"I wanted to get out of politics, which I did, because I realized that unless you play the game you can be removed fairly quickly, there's [sic] ways that it can be done, so I got out of politics, and I did get involved in issues..." (2)
Regarding chemtrails, the former BC Premier's approach was straight forward and direct - a freedom of information inquiry was sent to the Canadian federal government and the provincial government of British Columbia, and at the same time an explanatory letter containing a related recommendation was sent to all local governments in the BC province.
"Both the provincial government and the federal government must know what [chemtrails] is", he explained, "You can't go up there and spray
something in the sky, or do something in the sky, or move in the sky for that matter without getting permission through the governments. So they have to know what's happening. So I made this request of both the provincial and the federal government to advise me what information they have within government or within any of their ministries about climate control programs, because that's what I guessed it to be, and that's what most people think it to be if they're looking at this and analysing this a little more carefully than just a glance." (2)
".....I passed [the chemtrail letter] on to every municipality city and regional district in our province with a request that they pass a resolution to say that no particulate matter for climate control be sprayed in the atmosphere above their jurisdiction without informed consent. Now I know , having been at the local level in government, having been a councillor and a mayor, that's pretty hard for some council member or a mayor or a council to say, you know, we're not going to do this, this is crazy. Because it's not an unreasonable request...Who in their jurisdiction wouldn't want the council to say that no particulate matter be sprayed in their atmosphere above them, without having some knowlege of what it is and getting consent?" (2)
That was 2013. What has happened since then as a result of Vander Zalm's efforts?
Well, the short answer is that chemtrails and geo-engineering are still ongoing in British Columbia, Canada and the world, just like here in Australia. Nonetheless, Vander Zalm has succeeded in lending his highly credible voice to the ongoing battle against the chemtrail atrocity worldwide, while providing an example of an intelligent and common sense approach to dealing with government regarding it. The evasion, delay, misdirection and scoff tactics of government, beauraucracy and media that inevitably follows from such an approach serves to increasingly enlighten people as to the dire need we all have for a complete overhaul and reform of present governmental systems so that something like representation of the people's real welfare might take their place.
It is long overdue.
"I think people have to become more involved", concluded Vander Zalm in August 2013, "If you don't want to be led down the garden path, if you don't want to end up being totally controlled, you better get involved now....." (1)
*The quotations and information in the article ("Bill Vander Zalm takes on Chemtrails") above are taken from the following two interviews given by Vander Zalm in August 2013:
1) Chemtrails And Geoengineering (with former Premier of BC Bill Vander Zalm) - Press for Truth (From minute 7:00)
2) Bill Vander Zalm to Sheila Zilinsky ('Weekend Vigilante').
See also "The Goddard Report".
Vander Zalm discusses his freedom of information inquiry to federal and provincial governments, and letter to local governments here and here.
Vander Zalm discusses the response to his 2013 inquiries and requests to government here.
You may also wish to read the well known book about declassified weather modification and mind control technology:
“Angels Don't Play This HAARP” by Dr. Nick Begich and Jeane Manning (1997).
You can download this as a pdf document here.
Here is another: "Nick Begich : Technology to Control the Weather"
For suspected Australian HAARP-type technology locations click here.
(Too bad if we missed it though!)
The Queensland government requested access to Thai rain-making technology in 2009 with an "agreement" being reached about a year later in June 2010. How many flood-affected Queenslanders know that? Click here for the Sydney Morning Herald story.
Had there been trials or demonstrations in the interim? And what use of the technology exactly has been applied since? If I were a Queensland flood victim these are questions I'd be insisting on getting the answers to. And what about the Victorian floods of late 2010 and early 2011.....?
"....Environment Minister Malcolm Turnbull bet $10 million taxpayers' dollars, plus $1 million GST he could make it rain, even when there are no clouds. He did so by bankrolling research into a mysterious ionisation technology promoted by the Australian Rain Corporation.
"Electrification of the ionosphere to create clouds out of thin air. Certainly sounds a lot like the secret Australian rain device - no photographs allowed - that so excited the Minister and those who will share his six-month $10 million research funding....."
- Greg Hoy for the ABC's 7.30 Report aired 19/11/2007. See below for links.
In 2007, 10 million dollars were granted by the Australian Government to a company part owned by Rupert Murdoch's nephew, Matt Handbury, to trial Russian-developed "rain making" technology in Queensland. (Consider that state's often disastrous rainfall since then.)
In the 7.30 report story cited above, ABC reporter, Greg Hoy together with a physicist from the ANU, Neville Fletcher, and a representative of the old cloud seeding technology industry, Ian Searle, seem a little sceptical of the new technology. In light of more recent developments, however, I think it fair to say that Goldman Sachs man Turnbull and his electorate benefactor, Handbury, may have known something back in 2007 that Hoy and co didn't.
Curiously enough, among the apparent sceptics were a couple of representatives of Israel; no explanation is given for the relevance of their particular input for a story ostensibly dealing with a Russian technology being tested in Australia, but frankly I wouldn't be betting anything on the fact that they were representing themselves entirely honestly to an Australian reporter for the ABC. Perhaps Hoy and the ABC had missed the real significance of the story they were investigating, just like they were supposed to.......
For the 7.30 Report Story on the ABC click here (for the transcript) and here (for the video).
Actually the story was first reported by Tanya Nolan for "The World Today" program on ABC local radio on the 24th October 2007:
"It's a technique developed in Russia in the last decade, and it involves sending electrical charges into the atmosphere to make clouds and ultimately rain."
A further article from Anna Salleh of the ABC (click here) asked the question in November 2007 if clouds can be made "from scratch", stating that the Australian Rain Corporation technology was being tested to see if it could "make new rain clouds from blue skies by generating ions in the atmosphere...[using] a ground-based device to [thus] attract water molecules."
Perhaps we could pose here an additional question: aside from any application for enhancement (or denial) of rainfall, could this technology have found a further or different "use" altogether, independent of and/or in conjunction with the use of chemtrails, to create and/or expand cloud formation, thus denying sunlight to targeted areas for long term psychological warfare purposes and other strategic criminal/defence force type applications - such as solar energy denial for instance?
"In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels." (Executive Summary, pg. vii)
"While most weather-modification efforts rely on the existence of certain preexisting conditions, it may be possible to produce some weather effects artificially, regardless of preexisting conditions....Nanotechnology also offers possibilities for creating simulated weather. A cloud, or several clouds, of microscopic computer particles, all communicating with each other and with a larger control system could provide tremendous capability. Interconnected, atmospherically buoyant, and having navigation capability in three dimensions, such clouds could be designed to have a wide-range of properties. They might exclusively block optical sensors or could adjust to become impermeable to other surveillance methods. They could also provide an atmospheric electrical potential difference, which otherwise might not exist, to achieve precisely aimed and timed lightning strikes. Even if power levels achieved were insufficient to be an effective strike weapon, the potential for psychological operations in many situations could be fantastic." (Chapter 4 "Artificial Weather", pg.27) [Emphasis mine.]
I think it safe to assume that the US air force and other "defence"/criminal, megalomaniacal and paranoiac organizations the world over, including Australia of course, have realized now much of the "potential" outlined in the above-cited US air force document of 1996, for all kinds of objectives and for "both domestic and international applications" as it so brazenly puts it. Obviously.
(For more on the use of "PsyOps" in Greater Geelong click here.)
Finally the air force document discusses what in PsyOps terminology is known as "plausible deniability" (that's just plain bare-faced, sneaky and cowardly lying to the rest of us) and also the "costs", particularly of nanotechnology weather warfare (eg. chemtrails):
"One major advantage of using simulated weather to achieve a desired effect is that unlike other approaches, it makes what are otherwise the results of deliberate actions appear to be the consequences of natural weather phenomena. In addition, it is potentially relatively inexpensive to do. According to J. Storrs Hall, a scientist at Rutgers University conducting research on nanotechnology, production costs of these nanoparticles could be about the same price per pound as potatoes. This of course discounts research and development costs, which will be primarily borne by the private sector and be considered a sunk cost by 2025 and probably earlier." (Chapter 4 "Artificial Weather", pg.28)
As is usual when reading defence force documents a fair amount of translation is required into the plain language of decent human beings. Research and development costs borne by the private sector means the tax-payer of course, that is government funding/subsidising of private companies - Australian Rain Corporation for example. (Who bore the 10 million dollar cost for trials and development there?) Apparently it is not enough that psychopaths posing as our "defence" forces are poisoning/flooding the general populace, or otherwise manipulating their weather without their consent, the victims are also required to pay for the "privilege". Of course the "private sector" companies keep all the ill-begotten profits resulting from said development for themselves, profits that come out of tax payer funded defence budgets for example. Zero risk. Big business as usual in other words. Note also that when defence force organizations discuss "costs" they generally mean monetary cost, human cost being something completely outside the scope of their understanding or consideration, except perhaps in so far as corpses and other casualties impact their objectives with regards the former.
Rosalind Peterson, Environmental Impact Analyst, Independent Researcher and founder of "California Skywatch", proposes the question "How do you like your skies? Natural or man-made?" to the 2007 UN session on so-called global warming, stating further that persistent contrails (chemtrails) form man-made clouds that are "trapping warmth in the atmosphere, exacerbating global warming." Which of course puts utter lie to any claims that chemtrails have some kind of benevolent geoengineering mitigating purpose regarding global warming.
http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org is Rosalind's website including California Skywatch.
Actually Rosalind prefers the term "persistent contrails" to "chemtrails" saying that "chemtrails" are immediately written off as a hoax by officials, without investigation, as a part of their very protocol. Her own investigations have been thorough and methodical and her explanation of them
easy to follow for non-specialist listeners. Covered in this presentation:
- Chemtrails/persistent contrails can cover the sky with solid cloud cover in about 3 hours.
- NASA encouraged school children to count "persistent contrails" in what seemed to be some kind of conditioning exercise.
- Weather reporters can see the trails and their effects on satellites as they are happening but report them falsely as weather fronts nonetheless.
- From 1990 drinking water in California began showing spikes in certain months and certain years all at the same time for metals such as Arsenic, Aluminium, Barium, Strontium, Manganese, Calcium and Magnesium. Interestingly the first five of these are among the chemicals found in anomalously high quantities in Queenslander Edward Everett's rainwater sample taken in 2010 during a period of intense observed chemtrail activity. (See the report here.)
- Children in California and the US are increasingly suffering from rickets, a bone disease resulting from sunlight deficiency.
- Weather modification is currently being conducted all over the world including Australia without any kind of public or agricultural oversight or consent.
For an in depth investigation into the use of chemtrails and weather modification technology in the fossil fuel power structure's war against the solar industry click here.
The article below is intended as a supplement to 'The War Against Solar' Page and addresses doubts some may have about greenhouse gases emitted during the solar panel (PV) production process.
No, it does not. Not by a long shot.
Consider the table below, published just last year by the IPCC showing lifecycle emissions from various electricity supply technologies:
What is important to understand is that though the production of solar panels may result in the emission of some ultra-potent greenhouse gases, the relatively small quantities emitted and the long energy producing lifetime of the panels means that the CO2 emission equivalent per kWh produced (gCO2e/kWh) over the lifetime of the panels is still relatively low. Far lower than coal even when newly developed CCS technology is deployed. And cleaner still is Concentrated Solar Thermal technology which is, according to the IPCC data, up to 30 times cleaner than coal generated electricity without CO2 capture and sequester (CCS), and up to 8 times cleaner even when CCS is factored in.
What the two sets of data above mean, perhaps, is that we should be careful not to be carried away by superficial and possibly misleading facts, such as the ultra-greenhouse effect potency of some of the gases emitted by solar PV production, but rather see the whole picture, and the whole effect (in this case, for instance, the relative quantities), before forming our conclusions......
- Bob Carr, The Diary of a Foreign Minister, 2014
Note: Bob Carr is speaking specifically from his experience with the Gillard and Rudd Labour governments, but do you think Goldman-Sachs man Malcolm 'Turncoat' Turnbull's Liberal government is any less a lackey to the corporate-owned mass media, the big Anglo-Australian fossil fuel and mineral corporations, the banks and Israel? For proof of Malcolm Turnbull's direct involvement (along with Rupert Murdoch's nephew Matt Handbury) in the development of artificial cloud cover technology in Australia click here. To learn how artificial cloud cover technology is being applied in the war against solar energy click here.
The reader will have to make his own investigations into who is responsible for the vile crime against humanity and sick grab for/clinging to power that is chemtrails and geoengineering in Australia and world-wide. I would only point out that we are dealing here with the deployment of a technology as a military weapon, in black operations (including psy-ops) targeting individuals, groups or nations opposed to perpetrator goals. Among these black operations is the deployment of artificial cloud cover technology as a weapon against the renewable energy threat to the fossil fuel paradigm. Since the military takes its orders ultimately from the government, and since the public is being deliberately excluded (by secrecy and disinformation) from the decision-making process regarding the deployment of said technology, it follows that we are interested here with the question of who or what is guiding, influencing or manipulating government (military) policy behind the scenes, with regard to weather modification technology. In other words we are dealing with diverse perpetrator groups whose interests are not necessarily the same, but can nevertheless somewhat intersect at times, and who are more or less supra-govermental in nature. I think we can make some further deductions about these perpetrator groups from a few simple common sense observations.
The fact, for instance, that prices of goods in Australia have almost doubled in the space of just a few years (despite misleading inflation figures that attempt to belie the obvious fact) is indicative of vast amounts of money being printed by the central banking system for projects not revealed to the public. The implementation of vast weather modification schemes fits this profile exactly. Such a method of financing these projects, by the way, is of course nothing more than a clandestine form of taxation since the devaluation of our money is the price we pay. So, yes, to add insult to injury, we are also paying for the constant shower of toxins on our largely unwitting heads day in and day out.
There are a couple of highly pernicious symbiotic international relationships we should also consider. Firstly, there is the one between international bankers and the fossil fuel industry, since the ability of the former to extract their proverbial 'pound of flesh' from the latter, that is, interest and principal on gigantic loans, depends on the necessary continuity of the latter. Secondly, and perhaps most significantly, there is Israel's reqiurement that Western powers, and particularly America, maintain a stake in Middle Eastern fossil fuel supply since Israel's geo-political relevance depends entirely on the Western Powers' perceived dependence on Israel as a strategic ally and military base in that region.
So, keeping all of the above in mind, with regards chemtrails, geo-engineering and weather modification, I think we have enough to formulate more than a rough idea of what is going on here and who is behind it.
In any case it would appear that it is the the same malignant, lying spirit driving them all; the whole business is, after all, based on a pack of lies. And when the time comes, in a desperate attempt to save itself, no doubt that same malignant spirit will betray them all.
As for the rest of us, we were betrayed by our so-called leaders a long time ago.
"Well the other state governments have vested interests in maintaining the status quo. They collect the royalties from the coal mines; they collect the dividends from the coal-fired generators; they own these assets. And, they are not interested in disrupting that business model, even though that's locking consumers into higher energy costs over the medium to long term."
- Simon Corbell, ACT Minister for Energy, to Stephen Long of the ABC's Four Corners program in July 2014
“If we look to the whole change [the shift to clean tech solar from dirty fossil fuel] then you can immediately recognise that this a totally new paradigm. And then you can imagine how many conflicts happen, happened and will happen, because it leads to the dissolution of the conventional energy economy. Automatically. The primary energy economy will disappear. Because it is impossible to change from being a seller of coal; gas, uranium and coal, to the role of seller of solar radiation and wind. It's impossible. Wind and solar radiation is a common good. Not owned by anyone. And this is the largest, the most....the conventional primary energy sector is the most influential, with the highest turnover, the most influential part of the world economy. And then you can imagine the dimension of the conflict which happens. They will disappear. They become superfluous. Automatically. Therefore they have the interest to postpone it. They know their own end, but they want to postpone it. For decades. And we cannot accept that, because society, the world cannot wait to the point when the last drop of oil is consumed, or the last cubic metre of gas or the last tonne of uranium or coal – we cannot wait for that.”
“[Governments] feel themselves and they act as partners and assistants of the conventional [fossil fuel] power structure. This has many reasons. Some believe that there would be no alternative. They believe the arguments. Others are very closely linked, personally linked with the power companies and in different ways of corruption. The most comfortable way to corrupt a politician is the method, the legal method, to pay them later. After office.....after leaving government, then hiring him for the board, and this is a very popular, very usable way of let's say legalised corruption, and the thinking of all governments that they are dependent [on] the work of the energy supplier because no economy can work without energy, and the monopole of the conventional power, even in the thinking that there would be no alternative, this monopole gave them so much influence.....that many governments are puppets...in the hand of these power companies.”
- Dr Hermann Scheer, German Parliamentarian, Solar advocate and activist par excellence
- Maxim of the house of Rothschild and central bankers in general.
"No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or he will hold to the one, and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon."
- Lord Jesus Christ, Luke 16:13
“The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.”
- Benjamin Disraeli 1844, UK Prime Minister 1868, 1874 - 1880
“....all those in the democratic circles of America and Europe.....know well by now that the disastrous attack [of 9/11] was planned and executed by the American CIA and [the Israeli] Mossad with the help of the Zionist world so as to put the blame on the Arab countries and induce the Western powers to intervene in Iraq and in Afghanistan.”
- President Emeritus of the Italian Republic, Francesco Cossiga to the “Corriera Della Sera” (Italy's oldest and most widely read newspaper), 2007
Click here for the full article (in Italian only). For the most insightful documentary ever made about what really happened on 9/11 click here.
“September 11 was a godsend for Israel. It could now conjoin its merciless persecution of the Palestinians with Bush's War against Terror.”
- Professor Norman Finkelstein, Jewish-American political scientist and author, October, 2008
“The media's the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that's power. Because they control the minds of the masses.”
- Malcolm X, from a 1963 speech
"As for the petty little world of journalism, the media demonstrates how it, more than anyone, is careful to traffic only in authorized ideas and wares; while at the same time it fosters, through its antics, the illusion of a free circulation of ideas and opinions - not unlike jesters in a tyrant's court."
- Professor Robert Faurisson, The Adventure of Revisionism, September 1993
"Behold, I will bring of the synagogue of Satan, who say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie. Behold, I will make them to come and adore before thy feet. And they shall know that I have loved thee."
- Apocalypse 3:9
"To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."
"Here, then, we have a class of men [Freemasons] sworn, under most frightful penalties, to espouse the cause of a companion so far as to extricate him from any difficulty, to the extent of their power, whether he is right or wrong. How can such a man be safely intrusted with any office connected with the administration of the law?
"What shall we say to, what shall we do with, these men who swarm in every part of this country, and who are thus banded together to espouse each other's cause and to extricate each other from any difficulty, whether they are right or wrong, to conceal each other's crimes, to vote each other into office, and the like? Can wholesome society continue to exist under the influence of such an institution as this? "
- Rev. Charles Finney in "The Character, Claims and Practical Workings Of Freemasonry", 1869
See also 'The Zionist Menace' below.
"Let us beware of illusions: As long as people in the West believe in the six million and the gas chambers, they will always support Israel in principle, even if they criticise the Israeli treatment of the Palestinians as being unnecessarily harsh."
"If the holocaust were publicly exposed as a shameless fraud, if people all over the world learned that, while the Jews undoubtedly were ..... persecuted during the Second World War, there was no attempt to exterminate them, that the death factories, gas chambers and gas vans were a Jewish swindle, and that the six million figure was a fantastic exaggeration, the Zionist-led "New World Order" would be all but finished."
- Jurgen Graf, Historical revisionist-in-exile, 'Holocaust Revisionism and its Political Consequences', 2000
Travesty at Nuremberg
Do the war crimes trials prove the Holocaust narrative? Consider the following quotations from Nuremberg-contemporary authorities and other sources:
“The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence.... The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof.......”
- From the Charter of the International Military Tribunal (a.k.a the Nuremburg Farce)
"The initial war crimes trial was judged and prosecuted by Americans, Russians, British and French with, much of the time, effort and expenses devoted to whitewashing the Allies and placing the sole blame for WW2 upon Germany. What I have said of the nationalist character of the tribunals applies to the prosecution. The high ideals announced as the motives for creating these tribunals has not been evident. The prosecution has failed to maintain objectivity aloof from vindictiveness, aloof from personal ambitions for convictions. It has failed to strive to lay down precedents which might help the world to avoid future wars. The entire atmosphere here is unwholesome. Linguists were needed. The Americans are notably poor linguists. Lawyers, clerks, interpreters and researchers were employed who became Americans only in recent years, whose backgrounds were embedded in Europe's hatreds and prejudices."
- US Supreme Court Chief Justice Charles F. Wennerstrum, Judge at Nuremburg
- Thomas Dodd, Leading Prosecutor at the Nuremburg Trials
"I thought at the time and still think that the Nuremberg trials were unprincipled. Law was created ex post facto to suit the passion and clamour of the time. The concept of ex post facto is not congenial to the Anglo-American viewpoint on law."
- US Associate Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, Nuremberg contemporary
"The Nuremberg Trials have made the waging of an unsuccessful war a crime."
- Field Marshal Bernard L. Montgomery, 1948
"... a fantastic desecration of the ideals of Western Civilisation, and appalling miscarriage of justice... a misuse of evidence for vicious ends, all of which will someday be exposed as a shocking travesty of high legal and moral principles."
- Professor Henry M. Adams, Ph.D
“About this whole judgment there is the spirit of vengeance, and vengeance is seldom justice. The hanging of the 11 men convicted will be a blot on the American record which we shall long regret.”
- US Senator Robert Taft, 1946
"Chief US prosecutor Jackson is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg......I hate to see the pretence that he is running a court and proceeding according to common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas."
- US Supreme Court Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone
"He that is without sin, let him cast the first stone........"
"For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you......
- Lord Jesus Christ, John 8:7 & Matthew 7:2
Click here for Anthony Lawson's 'Holocaust Hate Speech and Were the Germans so Stupid? — Updated' (Or if that link is banned by the thought police in your neck of the woods try here instead.)*
Click here for 'The Nuremberg Trials and the Holocaust. Do the 'war crimes' trials prove extermination?' by Mark Weber
For much more from highly credible contemporary sources regarding the Nuremberg farce, click here.
No body. No murder weapon.
In the conclusion of the Anthony Lawson video linked above two highly pertinent questions are raised about the Nuremburg trials:
1. Was the evidence given by leading American forensic pathologist at the time, Dr. Charles Larson, that not one case of death by poison gas was found, overlooked or deliberately suppressed?
2. Was the evidence given by US War Department lawyer and investigator, Stephen F. Pinter, that there were no human gas chambers in any of the German camps, overlooked or deliberately suppressed?
Revisionist historian, Theodore O'Keefe elaborates further on evidence, provided by early on-the-spot US Army investigators such as Larson and Pinter and clearly suppressed at Nuremburg, in his excellent article, 'The Liberation of the Camps: Facts vs. Lies'. Here is an excerpt from the concluding summary of that article:
"The conclusions of the early US Army investigations as to the truth about the wartime German concentration camps have since been corroborated by all subsequent investigators and can be summarized:
1. The harrowing scenes of dead and dying inmates were not the result of a German policy of "extermination," but rather the result of epidemics of typhus and other disease brought about largely by the effects of Allied aerial attacks.
2. Stories of Nazi supercriminals and sadists who turned Jews and others into handbags and lampshades for their private profit or amusement were sick lies or diseased fantasies; indeed, the German authorities punished corruption and cruelty on the part of camp commanders and guards.
3. On the other hand, portrayals of the newly liberated inmates as saints and martyrs of Hitlerism were quite often very far from the truth; indeed, most of the brutalities inflicted on camp detainees were the work of their fellow prisoners, in contravention of German policy and German orders.
4. The alleged homicidal showers and gas chambers were used either for bathing camp inmates or delousing their clothes; the claim that they were used to murder Jews or other human beings is a contemptible fabrication. Orthodox historians and professional "Nazi-hunters" have quietly dropped claims that inmates were gassed at Dachau, Buchenwald and other camps in Germany. They continue, however, to keep silent regarding the lies about Dachau and Buchenwald, as well as to evade an open discussion of the evidence for homicidal gassing at Auschwitz and the other camps captured by the Soviets." [For the full article click here.]
For an excellent radio interview/discussion with Ted O'Keefe and Mark Weber of the Institute of Historical Review click here. (Note: This is Weber in his pre-compromise days.) The career liars at the Simon Wiesenthal Centre declined the invitation/opportunity to openly debate and try to refute the facts presented by the IHR pair in this radio broadcast to over a million listeners in the US in 1990. The real reason for the Wiesenthal Centre's policy of no-show, notwithstanding their lame excuses, is a chronic incapacity for anything but spin and rhetoric.
Actually, eyewitness testimony is not very reliable - a fact recognized by scholars and courts of law, as well as people of common sense, world-wide. In the hierarchy of evidence, so to speak, physical and documentary evidence always takes precedence over eyewitness testimony in a law court or in scholarly work, for obvious reasons; while the former is objective in nature, the subjective nature of the latter and the imperfection of the human memory on which it depends, makes it far more open to manipulation and distortion. And this tendency increases over time, not to mention with the presence of duress or incentive to see things in a particular way, both of which feature heavily when considering Holocaust testimonies.
It really is a testimony to the effectiveness of post war propaganda that so few people in the war-time "Allied" countries, Australia included, realize the practical non-existence of material or documentary evidence in support of essential narrative Holocaust allegations, while at the same time, so many harbour the deep impression that witnesses to alleged Holocaust crimes are far more numerous and far more credible than they really are. In fact, material and documentary evidence largely contradicts so-called 'eyewitness' Holocaust testimony, and many of the testimonies themselves are also contradictory (not to mention downright implausible or impossible) even from the same 'witness' reporting the same event on different occasions.
For readers who would like to investigate this further Jurgen Graf's highly readable and highly instructive article "Eye Witness Testimony of Homicidal Gassings in German Concentration Camps During World War II" is an excellent place to start. And Manfred Kohler's in depth treatment of the subject in "The Value of Testimony and Confessions Concerning the Holocaust"* is also a must-read.
Mass media propaganda is enormously powerful. It is a mistake to think we are above its influence if we have not turned it off altogether – the methods are so subtle and so psychologically insidious. Photographs or video can be shown out of context or sometimes so as to completely misrepresent what they actually depict. Pictures that depict the brutality, harshness and horror of war have a traumatising effect on our minds that render them vulnerable to manipulation and misdirection. Spin doctors and propagandists know this only too well. Cinema constructs scenarios that have never taken place in unscripted reality. And all this can be done with such expert manipulation of our emotions (the use of music is particularly powerful for example), that even a person in full possession of the facts of a matter can find himself being swayed in spite of them.
Consider the photo above. Do you really believe you know what it represents of reality? Actually that which we believe about the published images we see depends largely on the text that accompanies them and also on our own deep-rooted assumptions about things, our conjectures and our preconceived ideas. And these preconceived notions, to speak honestly, come to us largely from the mass media, and perhaps also from the so-called 'education' system. Now click the photo above for an explanation of it, this time based upon the facts.......
Consider the following quotations from Professor Norman Finkelstein, well-known Jewish-American political scientist and author of “The Holocaust Industry”. Keep in mind that Professor Finkelstein's parents were prisoners at Auschwitz and Majdanek and both survived the war:
"The Holocaust may yet turn out to be the greatest robbery in the history of mankind."
- 'The Holocaust Industry' p.138
"Much of the literature on Hitler's Final Solution is worthless as scholarship. Indeed, the field of Holocaust studies is replete with nonsense if not sheer fraud."
- ibid pg. 28
"Given the nonsense that is turned out daily by the Holocaust industry, the wonder is that there are so few skeptics."
- ibid pg. 32
“One of my father's lifelong friends was a former inmate with him in Auschwitz, a seemingly incorruptible left-wing idealist who on principle refused German compensation after the war. Eventually he became a director of the Israeli Holocaust museum, Yad Vashem. Reluctantly and with genuine disappointment, my father finally admitted that even this man had been corrupted by the Holocaust industry, tailoring his beliefs for power and profit. As the rendering of the Holocaust assumed ever more absurd forms, my mother liked to quote (with intentional irony) Henry Ford: 'History is bunk.' ”
- ibid pg. 5
"Once ideologically recast, The Holocaust.......proved to be the perfect weapon for deflecting criticism of Israel."
- ibid pg. 18
“The Holocaust has proven to be an indispensable ideological weapon. Through its deployment, one of the world's most formidable military powers, with a horrendous human rights record, has cast itself as a 'victim' state, and the most successful ethnic group in the United States has likewise acquired victim status. Considerable dividends accrue from this specious victimhood — in particular, immunity to criticism, however justified. Those enjoying this immunity, I might add, have not escaped the moral corruptions that typically attend it.
- ibid pg. 3
It is a disturbing fact that in a world where it is permissible to question just about anything, including the existence of God, the authority of our Lord Jesus Christ, the wisdom of holy scripture and commandments, and even the validity of time honoured and wholesome life-serving institutions such as Family and Marriage, it is no less than illegal in many countries to question the official Holocaust narrative even on perfectly reasonable and logical grounds. And if it is not exactly illegal then it is frowned upon and punished in other less overt ways. So why the foregoing of otherwise (apparently) cherished western principles of free speech and freedom of thought on this one issue to the exclusion of all others, we ask? Think about it. Is it Truth that needs protection by the law from intelligent investigation, or a Lie? You decide.
“The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the state of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people (but not their leaders!) and the Palestinian people in their entirety.”
“I assert, in fact, that these famous alleged homicidal "gas chambers" are nothing but a tall story of wartime.”
"Whoever allows himself to claim that the alleged Nazi gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews are a historical reality is, whether he likes it or not, giving support to a horrid lie that has become the number one war propaganda weapon of the State of Israel, a colonialist, racist and imperialist State. Let whoever has the nerve to support the Holocaust myth look at his hands! His hands are red with the blood of Palestinian children!"
- Professor Dr. Robert Faurisson, French essayist and historical revisionist
Robert Faurisson's interview with Jim Rizoli 2015
Robert Faurisson - A Most Honourable Man (Anthony Lawson's Tribute.)
holocaust /ˈhɒləkɔːst/ destruction or slaughter on a mass scale, especially caused by fire or nuclear war
"The 'democrats', who claim to have 'liberated' the German people from Hitler, brought nothing but terror and destruction. In Dresden, they murdered several hundreds of thousands people in one single hellish night and destroyed countless cultural treasures. Women who were giving birth to children in the delivery rooms of the burning hospitals jumped out of the windows, but within minutes, these mothers and their children, who were still hanging at the umbilical cords, were reduced to ashes too. Thousands of people whom the incendiary bombs had transformed into living torches jumped into the ponds, but phosphorus continues to burn even in the water. Even the animals from the zoo, elephants, lions and others, desperately headed for the water, together with the humans. But all of them, the new-born child, the mother, the old man, the wounded soldier and the innocent animal from the zoo and the stable, horribly perished in the name of 'liberation'."
- Thomas Brookes, 'Dresden 13 February 1945, A Real Holocaust'
- Walter Scott
The following excerpt from a June 1944 secret memo of the British Ministry of Information to high-level civil servants, leading media figures and the higher British Clergy sheds extraordinary light on how public thought leaders are clandestinely conscripted by government into shaping public opinion on propaganda lines. (The same protocol is, of course, active today.) Note that only anticipated Soviet atrocities are referred to - the Ministry could hardly make explicit reference to equally anticipated British and American atrocities (such as Dresden) in a memo to all too often gullible public thought leaders who were, if not exactly well meaning, at least disposed to consider themselves as such.
"The only alternative to denial [of anticipated Bolshevik atrocities] is to distract public attention from the whole subject. Experience has shown that the best distraction is atrocity propaganda directed against the enemy. Unfortunately the public is no longer so susceptible as in the days of the "Corpse Factory" and the "Mutilated Belgian Babies" and the "Crucified Canadians [i.e. World War I propaganda lies]." Your cooperation is therefore earnestly sought to distract public attention from the doings of the Red Army by your wholehearted support of various charges against the Germans......which have and which will be put into circulation by the Ministry. Your expression of belief in such may convince others."
- H.Hewett, Assistant Secretary for the British Ministry of Information, June 1944
"Atrocity propaganda is how we won the war. And we're only really beginning with it now! We will continue this atrocity propaganda, we will escalate it until nobody will accept even a good word from the Germans, until all the sympathy they may still have abroad will have been destroyed, and they themselves will be so confused that they will no longer know what they are doing. Once that has been achieved, once they begin to run down their own country and their own people, not reluctantly but with eagerness to please the victors, only then will our victory be complete. It will never be final. Re-education needs careful tending, like an English lawn. Even one moment of negligence, and the weeds crop up again - those indestructible weeds of historical truth."
- Sefton Delmer, British chief propagandist to expert on international law Prof. Grimm, after the German surrender, 1945
"We made a monster, a devil out of Hitler. Therefore we couldn’t disavow it after the war. After all, we mobilized the masses against the devil himself. So we were forced to play our part in this diabolic scenario after the war. In no way we could have pointed out to our people that the war was only an economic preventive measure."
- James Baker, former US foreign minister speaking to Der Spiegel, 1992
Consider also the following commentary from two high profile British political/military figures of the WWII period:
"The devastation of Dresden in February, 1945, was one of those crimes against humanity whose authors would have been arraigned at Nuremberg if that court had not been perverted."
- Rt. Hon. Richard. H.S. Crossman, MP, British Labour Government Minister
"Adolf Hitler only undertook the bombing of British civilian targets reluctantly after the RAF had commenced bombing German civilian targets... Hitler would have been willing at any time to stop the slaughter. Hitler was genuinely anxious to reach with Britain an agreement confining the action of aircraft to battle zones."
- J.M.Spaight CBE, Principle Assistant Secretary of the British Air Ministry
Churchill's culpability for setting the hideous precedent in 1940 of targeting civilians in the war with Germany is, of course, conceded by orthodox historians of the Second Word War. For example:
"It may be Inconvenient History but England rather than Germany initiated the murderous slaughter of bombing civilians thus bringing about retaliation. Chamberlain conceded that it was "absolutely contrary to International law." It began in 1940 and Churchill believed it held the secret of victory. He was convinced that raids of sufficient intensity could destroy Germany's morale, and so his War Cabinet planned a campaign that abandoned the accepted practice of attacking the enemy's armed forces and, instead made civilians the primary target. Night after night, RAF bombers in ever increasing numbers struck throughout Germany, usually at working class housing, because it was more densely packed.'
- From 'The Peoples' War' by Angus Calder, 1969
"We managed to drag the United States into the First World War and if they [Britain] do what we demand in regards to Palestine and the Jewish armed forces, then we can get the Jews in the USA to drag the United States into this one too."
- Chaim Weizmann, Zionist, President of the World Jewish Congress and later President of Israel, September 1941
In what appears to be international Jewry et al's panic stations attempt to halt the increasing number of people waking up to the Holocaust fraud, Hollywood has come up with its latest insult to the collective intelligence: a film called "Denial", allegedly about the Irving/Lipstadt Holocaust libel trial of early 2000, but unlikely to have even a passing resemblance to the reality of that unfortunate event, in which exceptional WW2 historian David Irving (not the Hollywood caricature), entirely on his own and with his own funds, took on a huge legal team costing millions of dollars and funded by Jewish tycoons and organizations, among them Steven Spielberg and the American Jewish Committee.......
Simply, Germany under Hitler had become a dangerous example on the international stage, of an alternative, largely independent and highly effective system of national politics and economics.
"Therefore we will not establish our economic policy to suit the conceptions or desires of bankers in New York or London. Germany's economic policy is conducted exclusively in accordance with the interests of the German people. In this respect I am a fanatical socialist, one who has ever in mind the interests of all his people. I am not the slave of a few international banking syndicates. I am under no obligation to any capitalist group. I sprang from the German people. My Movement, our Movement, is a German people's Movement, and it is only to this German people that we are obligated."
- Adolf Hitler, Munich 24 February 1941
"Germany's unforgivable crime before the second world war was her attempt to extricate her economic power from the world's trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit."
- Winston Churchill to Lord Robert Boothby 1960
"Not the political doctrine of Hitler has hurled us into this war. The reason was the success of his increase in building a new economy. The roots of war were envy, greed and fear."
- Major General J.F.C. Fuller, British military historian
"The genie is out of the bottle. And I'm absolutely convinced, although for the moment we are in a very tricky, dangerous situation, that we have already passed the age of repression."
- The inimitable Ernst Zundel, civil rights activist and author, 1998
Below are some links to essential reading and viewing for those new to the subject of historical revisionism, and in particular those who never even knew there was another side to the Holocaust story – you may be in for something of a shock as to what the physical and documentary evidence actually indicates. In any case, if you value the truth, you need only resolve to do your best to ignore the almost ubiquitous antics of the Zionist propaganda and libel machine (Google, wikipedia etc...) that surrounds all politically incorrect views on the Holocaust subject, and let clear thinking and reason do the rest.
Here is a rule of thumb: if what you are reading resorts simply to calling people names while endowing its own views with dismissive, quasi-religious qualities that allow it to conveniently evade the need for evidential verification, such as 'self-evident', 'obvious', or 'common knowledge' and so on, then you are probably dealing with a fraud......
Suggested further reading
Robert Faurisson: essential quotations.
The Faurisson Archive.
The Gas Chambers: Fact or Myth? (Faurisson interview with 'Storia Illustrata'.)
'The Victories of Revisionism' by Professor Faurisson
holocausthandbooks.com (A huge collection of books and documentaries on the holocaust by revisionists worldwide.)
codoh.com (Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust) Click here for the website's 'What we do and what we believe page.'
'The Hoax of the Twentieth Century' by Professor Arthur Butz in pdf. Seminal book on the Holocaust hoax first published in 1976.
'The Leuchter Report' by Fred Leuchter. Myth-busting report on the alleged execution gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek, Poland by eminent execution equipment expert, based on on-site investigations and analysis.
'The Rudolf Report' by Germar Rudolf. Another expert report, this one from chemist Germar Rudolf, based on his 'scholarly impeccable' onsite analysis of chemical and technical aspects of the alleged "gas chambers" at Auschwitz. Surely the final nail in the coffin of the Auschwitz fraud.
Jurgen Graf: 'Holocaust Revisionism and its Political Consequences'
- Article 19, United Nations Declaration of Human Rights
"To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."
"That’s the thing about free speech that Doug Christie understood; it’s the gift that you have to give to your opponents, if you want it for yourself."
- Ezra Levant, Jewish-Canadian lawyer and broadcaster
Canadian defence lawyer Doug Christie spent much of his life defending the freedom of speech and thought of politically incorrect individuals with powerful enemies. Sadly he passed away in March 2013. At his funeral, Order of Canada winner Fr. Lucien Larre proclaimed him a saint for fighting "for what was right." "No matter the threats to his life", said Fr. Larre, "or the number of times his office windows were broken. He stood tall."
Below are some quotations from the "Battling Barrister".
“We have clear knowledge that if we don't do this we only get weaker, we only will get weaker tomorrow. This tyranny is growing. It's not diminishing. It is not something that is going to go away. There is no easy solution. There is no quick fix. We got this way over a long period of time being apathetic, indifferent and contemptuous of other people's problems saying I'm alright, to hell with you. You probably deserve to get all that bad press because you opened your mouth, right? That's what we say about most people who get in trouble. And it's so easy to do. And that process of looking after me too, what's that? Do you know what that is? That's isolation. And that's the first step to alienation and criminalisation. Cause if they can do that to you, they can do that to your neighbour, and gradually we all sit in fear in our homes waiting for our pension cheque wondering if someone's watching, whether we got more money than the last guy and whether Grant Bristow's next cousin is listening to our telephone. We live in terror.” [October 1997]
“I am only one, but still I am one. I cannot do everything, but still I can do something; and because I cannot do everything, I will not refuse to do something that I can do.”
- Doug Christie, Advocate of Freedom
Actually, there is a wealth of viewing on the subject of Holocaust revisionism to keep anyone who delights in truth (or as Prof. Faurisson prefers to put it, 'exactitude') over propaganda interested for days on end. The list that follows is but a small portion of that store, but may serve well as an introduction for those relatively new to the subject.
Off Your Knees, Germany! Ernst Zundel 1983 - 2003 (Full Video)
Robert Faurisson Documentary
Doug Christie YouTube Channel
Doug Christie: Thoughts on the Release of Ernst Zundel 2010
Doug Christie Free Speech is the Issue. Speech from Oct 16 1997 in Toronto
Short selected clips from the Douglas Christie Memorial Video Archive
David Cole: Jewish documentary maker exposes the fraud of Auschwitz
Bishop Richard Williamson on the Holocaust – 2008 (A Bishop of the True Church, so far courageous and resolute, despite persecution from both within and without the Catholic church...)
The Truth about Holocaust by Jewish Professor Domergue - Parts 1-3 (This links to part 1, you can follow the rest on YouTube. Or you can watch the interview in one unbroken part here.)
Sylvia Stolz "The Reality of Freedom of Expression" Full Speech, Uncut (Click CC for English subtitles.)
Sylvia Stolz 2013 "A Personal Reply" w. English Subtitles
Ursula Haverbeck: The Panorama Interview, with English Subtitles
Ursula Haverbeck on The Greatest Problem of Our Time (with English Subtitles)
The Great Holocaust Trial 1985 (FULL VIDEO)
The Revisionists - men & women of heart and soul (Tribute clip)
In what appears to be international Jewry et al's panic stations attempt to halt the increasing number of people waking up to the Holocaust fraud, Hollywood has come up with its latest insult to the collective intelligence: a film called 'Denial', allegedly about the Irving/Lipstadt Holocaust libel trial of early 2000, but unlikely to have even a passing resemblance to the reality of that unfortunate event, in which exceptional WW2 historian David Irving, entirely on his own and with his own funds, took on a huge legal team costing millions of dollars and funded by Jewish tycoons and organizations, among them Steven Spielberg and the American Jewish Committee.
Other Recommended Reading
"None are so hopelessly enslaved, as those who falsely believe they are free. The truth has been kept from the depth of their minds by masters who rule them with lies. They feed them on falsehoods till wrong looks like right in their eyes."    - Goethe
1. Are we the unwitting slaves of a hidden hand?
Click here for the article 'Do I Need to be a Slave to Money? (Applying the Scientific Method to the question of Liberty.)'
2. Are your desires being used to control and enslave you?
Click here for the article 'The Sex Deception (A Young Man's Guide.)'
It's 1972. Eight men and women and a psychology professor walk into various psychiatric hospitals in the US pretending to be hearing voices. Immediately institutionalized by all the hospitals bar none they then return to their normal behaviour. Will any of the psychiatrists or nurses on the hospital staff spot the deception? What happens next will shatter any illusions you may have about psychiatry forever..........
"Any diagnostic process that lends itself too readily to massive errors of this sort cannot be a very reliable one."
- D.L.Rosenhan, psychologist
Psychiatrists: health professionals or thought policemen? You decide.......Click here for more.
“An antisemite used to be someone who hates Jews; nowadays an antisemite is someone Jews hate.”
- Gilad Atzmon, Jewish musician and author, 2011
"[Israel] is a vandal state.....Israel is Genghis Khan with a computer."
"...sometimes I feel that Israel has come out of the boils of the hell, a satanic state."
- Professor Norman Finkelstein, Jewish-American political scientist and author, 2009
"I think party donations and a program of giving trips to MPs and journalists to Israel.....it needs to be highlighted because I think it reached a very unhealthy level.”
“It’s an appalling situation if Australia allows a group of [Jewish] businessmen [in Melbourne] to veto policy on the Middle East.”*
- Bob Carr, interview with Sarah Ferguson (ABC), and *excerpt from 'The Diary of a Foreign Minister', 2014
Click here for the transcript of the Sarah Ferguson interview. Or here for the video.
Left: Two sides of politics, but both Bob Carr and Malcolm Fraser have publicly acknowledged the inappropriate and disproportionate power wielded by the Jewish community lobby in Australian politics.........
Consider the following excerpt from Zionist gatekeeper Jon Faine's interview with Malcolm Fraser in 2014:
Jon Faine (ABC): Bob Carr has managed to upset a lot of people here in Australia and overseas with his memoir, saying that he thought that the pro-Israel, in particular Jewish community lobby in Australia wielded too much power. What does Malcolm Fraser think of that?
Malcolm Fraser: They certainly do.....The Jewish community seeks to get Australia to support policies as defined by Israel.
- Malcolm Fraser, 'The Conversation Hour' (ABC), May 2014
Click here for an mp3 of the full interview (Note that the part referring to pro-Israel lobby influence starts at around the 45 minute mark.)
Israeli Deceptions Go South: Ex-Australian Prime Minister Confirms Israel Attacked America
Israel's Apologists: Anthony Lawson exposes the ABC's Zionist Gatekeeper Jon Faine
The results are summarised below. The black text is verbatim from the report. The blue and green text is some sorely needed common sense commentary sadly lacking from said report.
What the ATSB found
The Monash University Institute of Railway Technology (IRT) carried out an analysis of four rail sections [allegedly] removed from the derailment site and, for comparison purposes, one section of 80 lb/yd rail from a stockpile at Kulgera, Northern Territory.
On the basis of above said analysis:
The ATSB found the train had derailed on a section of 80 lb/yd rail, while travelling over a flash-butt welded joint that had fractured through a pre-existing defect in the rail foot. The defect most likely occurred during the flash-butt welding process [about 30 years ago], which subsequently led to crack propagation and brittle fracture that extended vertically through the rail web.
Whose word do we have for it that all the rail sections allegedly taken from the derailment site were indeed what they purported to be? Do we trust these people? I don't. We know from the report that there was a stockpile of similar rail sections in nearby Kulgera. Analysis of the section taken randomly from said stockpile suggested that probably a significant number had very convenient and suggestive weld defects ready to go. Nice and handy......
Metallurgical evidence indicated that the fracture had propagated slowly from the initiating defect and had likely been in existence for some time, remaining undetected during track inspections and the passage of trains for a period up to 30 years.
This nonsense is completely at odds with ultrasonic testing of the weld only eight months prior to the derailment. (See below.)
The last track inspection from a locomotive cab before the derailment was on 3 June 2014, where the only defects reported were two track signage issues. Other inspections of this type carried out on 23 July 2013, 20 December 2013 and 25 March 2014 identified various items including rough riding, mud-hole, ballasting and some dip welds. No defects indicating or suggesting rail or track deficiencies were reported through locomotive cabin inspections in the vicinity of the PoD [Point of Derailment].
GWA records showed that track at the1036.541 km mark had been tamped* in September 2013 with a detailed track geometry inspection carried out shortly after (October 2013). About four months later, in February 2014, another detailed track geometry inspection was carried out. No track defects were recorded at or near the PoD.
A second before disaster: a video camera on the lead locomotive captures this extraordinary shot of the sabotaged rail track a moment before impact. Note the prominent position of the so-called “displaced ballast”. Does that look like gravel to you?
*Tamping is the process by which ballast is packed around the sleepers of a track to ensure the correct alignment for the location, speed and curvature of the line.
Speno advised that a defect of 9.0 mm (or greater) would normally produce a defect alarm, thereby prompting a manual ultrasonic test of the suspected defect. In this case an alarm had not been generated, suggesting that the automatic system assessed the defect as falling below the defined alarm limit.
In other words, state-of-the-art ultra-sonic testing of the rail, by an independent third party, at exactly the point of derailment and only 8 months prior to the derailment, found no cause for even the lowest priority caution of monitor and optional removal within 30 days.
Detection of Rail Defects
As would be expected for an increase in sensitivity of the instrument, the new test found more defects, a seemingly impressive accomplishment until you consider that, in fact, all but four needed either no further action at all or needed only further monitoring for possible future action. And of the four "high priority" defects identified, two had been identified previously by the inspection of November 2013. Regarding these latter two there is nothing to indicate any significant change in actual results but only in the subjective appraisal of them - going from low priority to a higher one in the August testing. Even then no immediate removal/repair was recommended for three out of four of these so-called “high priority” defects, but only “more frequent monitoring and reassessment”. As for the one that needed immediate repair, that's where the natural progression theory really starts to break down.
“a defect similar to that which precipitated the derailment.....” [The most obvious explanation for it not being detected in the November test, that is, it simply wasn't there, is again incredibly overlooked.]
"another broken rail at the 975.244 km mark, which had also fractured through a flash-butt weld at a defect in the foot area. [Oh yes, that ubiquitous “defect in the foot area” again.....We are not told the details of any analysis of the condition of any sample purporting to be this second broken rail, or if indeed it had been analysed at all by the IRT. What is the basis for these conclusions?] In accordance with GWA’s procedures, the broken rail was repaired before the passage of the next train."
In other words, at the time of the derailment, there was a broken rail some 60 kms further down the line from the PoD that needed immediate repair before any train could pass over it without, presumably, derailing! What are the chances, (if we, like the ATSB, do not allow the possibility of deliberate sabotage shortly before derailment), of two rail sections 60 kms apart reaching naturally a critical condition at exactly the same time, some time between the passage of the previous train and the train that was derailed?
The report goes on to conclude that:
Now think, gentlemen, what would be the most reasonable conclusion arising from the fact that state-of-the-art ultrasonic testing of only 8 months prior to the derailment had failed to find even the lowest of priority of defects at either of the broken rail locations?
Even allowing for some error in the ultrasonic test results how likely would the test be not to detect at least something of flaws that, if we presuppose a natural progression (as does the ATSB), must have been “well advanced” by the time of the inspection?
In light of this, would it not be fair (not to mention thorough), to at least consider the possibility of sabotage?
Actually it could not be clearer:
The facts speak for themselves. Above (left and right): Two breaks in the the line 60 kms apart, both just happening to be in a critical or worse condition at exactly the same time, between the time of the derailment and, presumably, the passage of the previous train. Clearly the criminal vermin behind this cowardly act of terrorism, an act which put the lives of two drivers and those in the crew van at considerable risk, were leaving nothing to chance. If the first break failed, the second would do the job. Note the proximity of a service road entry point to the point of derailment. (See also below.)
Scene of the Crime. Above: Both breaks occurred in close proximity to service road entry points with access to the Stuart Highway. In this close up image from Google Earth it can be seen that the derailment point is a short distance from a very convenient service road entry point. The next nearest one is 12kms south near Marryat SA. The roads leading west and south west both lead back to the Stuart Highway.
"On this basis therefore, it was evident that the ultrasonic testing conducted in November 2013, as part of GWA’s scheduled maintenance processes, had been inefficient at detecting and/or appropriately assessing some internal rail defects in the 80 lb/yd rail between Northgate and Alice Springs."
Yes, clearly "evident"...... if you say so ATSB.......
«Se l'olocausto venisse mostrato pubblicamente come una frode vergognosa, e se tutte le persone al mondo venissero a conoscenza che, mentre gli Ebrei venivano indubbiamente perseguitati durante la Seconda Guerra Mondiale non ci fu mai un tentativo di sterminarli, che le industrie di morte, le camere a gas ed i vagoni a gas sono una fandonia Ebraica, e che l'immagine dei 6 milioni è una fantasiosa esagerazione, il Nuovo Ordine Mondiale condotto dai Sionisti sarebbe finito.»
- Jurgen Graf, revisionista svizzero, “L'ultima Battaglia”, 2000
Il tribunale di Norimberga provò i cosiddetti crimini di guerra dell'Olocausto'? Considerate che cosa disse il giudice americano della Corte Suprema, Charles Wennerstrum, che sedette in uno dei tribunali a Norimberga:
«Se avessi saputo sette mesi fa quello che so adesso non sarei mai venuto qui. Il processo iniziale per crimini di guerra venne presieduto e condotto da americani, russi, inglesi e francesi con la maggior parte del tempo, degli sforzi e delle spese impiegati per coprire le colpe degli Alleati e per addossare la responsabilità esclusiva della seconda guerra mondiale alla Germania.
«Quello che ho detto sul carattere nazionalista dei tribunali si applica all’accusa. Gli alti ideali, proclamati come se fossero le ragioni della creazione di questi tribunali, non erano evidenti.
“L’accusa non è riuscita a tenere lontana l’obbiettività dallo spirito di vendetta, dalle ambizioni personali mirate all’ottenimento delle condanne. Non è riuscita a stabilire dei precedenti che potevano aiutare il mondo ad evitare future guerre.
«C’è un’atmosfera qui assolutamente malsana. C’era bisogno di interpreti. Gli americani sono particolarmente scadenti come interpreti. Sono stati utilizzati avvocati, impiegati, interpreti e studiosi diventati americani solo in anni recenti*, la cui formazione era radicata negli odi e nei pregiudizi europei…»
- Capo della giustizia (US), Charles Wennerstrum, 23 Febbraio 1948
* Cioè, ebrei. Per esempio, secondo la stima dell’avvocato generale (per l'accusa), americano Thomas J. Dodd, la delegazione americana nel Processo di Norimberga si è trovata costituita da ebrei nella proporzione del 75%. (Fonte: una lettera a sua moglie del 20 settembre 1945.)
«Jackson è in trasferta a condurre il suo festino cruento di alta classe a Norimberga......odio vedere la finzione secondo cui sta dirigendo una corte e un procedimento in base alla legge ordinaria. E’ una truffa un po’ troppo ipocrita per soddisfare le mie idee vecchio stampo».......
- Harlan Fiske Stone, Presidente della Corte Suprema degli Stati Uniti, 1946
“Chi di voi è senza peccato, scagli per primo la pietra.......”
"...perché col giudizio con cui giudicate sarete giudicati, e con la misura con la quale misurate sarete misurati."
- Il Signore Gesù Christo, Vangelo secondo Giovanni 8:7 e Matteo 7:2
Le indagini ufficiali dell'esercito americano
Che cosa scoprirono davvero gli inquirenti ufficiali dell'esercito americano (compresi i patologi forensi) nei campi di concentramento tedeschi subito dopo la seconda guerra mondiale?
Considerate il seguente estratto dal saggio del revisionista americano Theodore O'Keefe:
Le conclusioni delle prime inchieste dell’esercito americano per quanto riguarda i campi di concentramento tedeschi nel tempo di guerra sono state da allora corroborate da tutte le inchieste successive che possono essere così riassunte:
1. Le strazianti scene di morti e di detenuti morenti non erano il risultato di una politica tedesca di sterminio ma piuttosto la conseguenza di epidemie di tifo ed altre malattie scoppiate ampiamente a causa degli attacchi aerei alleati.
2. Racconti di supercriminali e sadici nazisti che hanno trasformato ebrei in borsette e paralumi per loro uso e divertimento privato, non erano altro che volgari menzogne o fantasie malate. Le autorità tedesche, anzi, punivano la corruzione e la crudeltà da parte dei comandanti e delle guardie dei campi.
3. D’altro canto, l’immagine dei prigionieri appena liberati come santi e martiri dell’ideologia hitleriana, era molto spesso assai lontana dalla verità. Invece la maggior parte dei maltrattamenti inflitti ai detenuti era opera dei loro compagni di prigionia, contravvenendo agli ordini e alla politica tedesca.
4. Le presunte docce omicide e camere a gas furono usate sia per uso doccia dei detenuti che per la disinfestazione dai pidocchi dei loro vestiti. L’affermazione che fossero state usate per uccidere ebrei e altri esseri umani è una spregevole falsificazione. Storici ortodossi e “ cacciatori di nazisti “ professionisti hanno già smentito le affermazioni che a Dachau, Buchenwald o in altri campi in Germania siano stati gassati dei prigionieri. Tuttavia continuano a rimanere in silenzio riguardo alle menzogne di Dachau e Buchenwald e altri luoghi simili in Germania e continuano ad evitare ogni apertura di dialogo sulle prove delle gassazioni omicide ad Auschwitz e in altri campi occupati dai sovietici.
In realtà le testimonianze oculari non sono molto attendibili. Non solo per le indagini storiche, ma anche per la criminologia e le procedure giudiziarie, esiste un ordine d’importanza riguardante le prove: la prova materiale viene per prima, la prova documentaria è la successiva e i resoconti dei testimoni oculari vengono per ultimi.
Come spiega bene il revisionista svizzero, Jurgen Graf:
«Ci sono buone ragioni da parte dei procuratori per considerare inaffidabili i resoconti dei testimoni oculari. Primo, la memoria umana è imperfetta perché è sempre possibile che un testimone mescoli quello che ha vissuto con quello che ha letto o ascoltato successivamente. In secondo luogo, le emozioni, fattori come le simpatie e le antipatie, spesso giocano un ruolo. Da un punto di vista legale, bisogna distinguere tra resoconti di testimoni parziali e imparziali.»
Ovviamente tutti questi fattori svolgono un grande ruolo nelle testimonianze oculari del cosiddetto Olocausto. Inoltre, a causa della propaganda continua ed efficace, poche persone sono consapevoli che, in realtà, riguardo all'Olocausto:
1. Le prove documentarie e materiali contraddicono le testimonianze oculari;
2. Non ci sono così tanti testimoni oculari (che sostengono, cioè, di aver personalmente assistito a qualcosa di pertinente) com'è generalmente dato per scontato;
3. Le testimonianze oculari sono molto più contraddittorie di quanto viene generalmente dato per scontato.
La propaganda dei mass media è estremamente potente. È un errore pensare che siamo al di là dell'influenza dei mass media se non l'abbiamo spenti del tutto - i metodi sono così sottili e così psicologicamente insidiosi. Le fotografie o i video possono essere mostrati fuori contesto o, talvolta, in modo da travisare completamente ciò che realmente rappresentano. Le immagini che mostrano la brutalità, la crudeltà e l'orrore della guerra hanno un effetto traumatizzante sulla nostra mente tanto che la rendono vulnerabile alla manipolazione e alla disinformazione. Questo lo sanno fin troppo bene i manipolatori di opinione e i propagandisti. Il cinema costruisce scenari che non hanno mai avuto luogo nella realtà senza copione. E tutto questo può essere fatto con una manipolazione così esperta delle nostre emozioni (l'uso della musica è particolarmente potente, per esempio), che anche colui che è in piena conoscenza dei fatti veri di una questione può trovarsi comunque influenzato nonostante essi.
Considerate la foto sopra. Credete di capire bene che cosa davvero rappresenta? Infatti quello che crediamo riguardo alle foto probabilmente dipende in gran parte dal testo che le accompagna e anche dalle nostre supposizioni, congetture ed idee preconcette, no? E queste idee, per parlare onestamente, ci vengono in gran parte attraverso i mass media, no? Ora cliccate la foto sopra per una spiegazione al riguardo basata invece sui fatti......
È un fatto inquietante che in un mondo dove è lecito mettere in discussione qualsiasi cosa, compresa l'esistenza di Dio, l'autorità del nostro Signore Gesù Cristo, la validità della Sacra Scrittura e dei comandamenti, e persino la forma di istituzioni sane e radicate nel tempo, come la famiglia e il matrimonio, è nientemeno illegale in molti paesi mettere in discussione la narrazione ufficiale dell'Olocausto, anche su basi perfettamente ragionevoli e logiche. E se non è esattamente illegale, viene comunque non visto di buon occhio, e poi punito in altri modi meno evidenti, persino clandestini. Quindi dobbiamo chiedere perché esiste questa eccezione notevole ai (di solito cari) principi occidentali di libertà di parola e libertà di pensiero? Chiedetevi: è la verità che ha bisogno di protezione dalla legge contro indagini intelligenti, o le bugie? Che ne dite?
«Nel mondo occidentale, le genti hanno il diritto di contestare tutte le religioni, tranne la religione dell'Olocausto. Si può prendere in giro Dio, Gesù, Mohamed ma non quello che Simon Wiesenthal, Elie Wiesel e Simone Veil hanno detto riguardo al presunto genocidio o alle presunte camere a gas.»
«II preteso genocidio ebraico e le pretese camere a gas hitleriane formano una sola e medesima menzogna storiografica, che ha permesso una gigantesca truffa politico-finanziaria di cui i principali beneficiari sono lo stato d’Israele e il sionismo internazionale e di cui le principali vittime sono il popolo tedesco (ma non i suoi dirigenti!) e tutto il popolo palestinese»
«Queste famose «camere a gas» omicide non sono altro che una frottola di guerra.»
- Prof. Robert Faurisson, saggista e storico revisionista francese
Considerate le seguenti citazioni di Prof. Norman Finkelstein, scienziato politico ebraico-americano ed autore del noto libro “L'industria dell'Olocausto”. Tenete in mente che entrambi i suoi genitori furono prigionieri ad Auschwitz, e nè l'uno nè l'altro vennero uccisi da nessuno:
«L’Olocausto è un business che minaccia di diventare la più grande rapina nella storia dell’umanità.»
- L'industria dell'Olocausto, pg.135 (versione inglese)
«In verità, tutti gli studi sull’Olocausto sono pieni di sciocchezze, se non di frodi assoluti.»
[Per non parlare delle manipolazioni emotive di Hollywood e la TV, a proposito.]
- ibid pg.28
«Se si considera il profluvio di sciocchezze prodotto quotidianamente dall'industria dell'Olocausto, c'è da stupirsi che gli scettici siano così pochi.»
- ibid pg.39
«Uno degli amici di più lunga data di mio padre era stato con lui ad Auschwitz ed era, o almeno sembrava, un incorruttibile idealista di sinistra che per principio rifiutò dopo la guerra il risarcimento tedesco. In seguito divenne un dirigente del museo israeliano dell'Olocausto, lo Yad Vashem. Con riluttanza e sinceramente deluso, mio padre dovette ammettere che perfino un uomo come quello era stato corrotto dall'industria dell'Olocausto, adattando le proprie idee al potere e al profitto. Dal momento che l'interpretazione dell'Olocausto assumeva forme sempre più assurde, a mia madre piaceva citare, non senza ironia, Henry Ford: «La storia è una sciocchezza».
- ibid pg.7
«L’Olocausto ha dimostrato di essere un’arma ideologica indispensabile grazie alla quale una delle più formidabili potenze militari del mondo [Israele], con una fedina terrificante quanto a rispetto dei diritti umani, ha acquisito lo status di “vittima”, e lo stesso ha fatto il gruppo etnico di maggior successo negli Stati Uniti. Da questo specioso status di vittima derivano dividendi considerevoli, in particolare l’immunità alle critiche, per quanto fondate esse siano. Aggiungerei che coloro che godono di questa immunità non sono sfuggiti alla corruttela morale che di norma l’accompagna.»
- ibid pg.5
- ibid pg.17
«[Israele] è uno Stato vandalico.....è Genghis Khan con un computer.»
«A volte sento che Israele è venuto fuori dalla valle dell'inferno, uno stato satanico.»
«Credo che Israele, come tanti commentatori hanno sottolineato, stia diventando uno Stato folle. E dobbiamo essere onesti su questo. Mentre il resto del mondo vuole la pace, l'Europa vuole la pace, gli Stati Uniti vogliono la pace, ma questo Stato [Israele] vuole la guerra, la guerra e ancora la guerra.»
- Intervista a Finkelstein da "Today's Zaman", 19 Gennaio 2009
Dresda 13 Febbraio 1945: il vero Olocausto
Dresda, Germania (La cosiddetta 'Firenze del Nord'): una città senza difese; un bersaglio senza nessun obiettivo militare ragionevole; una città tra tante altre città di Germania completamente distrutta dalle forze alleate in quel tempo, utilizzando le stesse bombe di fosforo preferite ancora in questi giorni dallo stato d'Israele in attentati aerali contro gli uomini, le donne e i bambini indifesi di Palestinia; ecco il vero olocausto della seconda guerra mondiale.
«I “democratici”, che affermano di aver “liberato” il popolo tedesco da Hitler, non hanno portato nient’altro che terrore e distruzione. A Dresda, uccisero diverse centinaia di migliaia di persone in una sola notte d’inferno e distrussero innumerevoli tesori d’arte. Le donne che stavano partorendo i propri figli, nelle sale parto degli ospedali in fiamme, si buttarono fuori dalle finestre, ma nel giro di pochi minuti, queste madri con i loro bambini, ancora appesi al cordone ombelicale, furono anch’essi ridotti in cenere. Migliaia di persone che le bombe incendiarie avevano trasformato in torce umane si buttarono negli stagni, ma il fosforo continuava a bruciare anche nell’acqua. Anche gli animali dello Zoo, gli elefanti, i leoni e gli altri, cercavano disperatamente l’acqua, come gli umani. Ma tutti loro, il neonato, la madre, il vecchio, il soldato ferito e l’animale innocente dello Zoo e della stalla, morirono in modo orribile in nome della “liberazione”».
-Thomas Brookes, Dal suo saggio, 'Un Olocausto vero: Dresda', 2008
«Volando abbastanza alto da evitare l’artiglieria antiaerea, il pilota del bombardiere notturno che liberava il suo carico non ascoltò mai le grida della madre, né vide mai la carne bruciata del bambino. Questo fu il vero Olocausto, una parola che significa morte prodotta dal fuoco».
- Prof. Nicholas Kollerstrom, revisionista, autore e saggista inglese
Semplicemente la Germania è diventata sotto Hitler un esemplare pericoloso di un politico ed economico modo diverso ed efficace.
«Noi non conduciamo la nostra politica economica secondo le vedute o i desideri dei banchieri di New York o di Londra, la politica economica della Germania viene invece condotta esclusivamente in base agli interessi del popolo tedesco. Ed in ciò sono un fanatico socialista che conserva costantemente davanti ai propri occhi gli interessi totali del suo popolo.»
- Adolf Hitler, 24/2/1941
«Il delitto imperdonabile della Germania prima della Seconda Guerra Mondiale fu il suo tentativo di sganciare la sua economia dal sistema di commercio mondiale, e di costruire un sistema di cambi indipendente di cui la finanza mondiale non poteva più trarre profitto.»
- Winston Churchill, 1960
«Non fu la politica di Hitler a lanciarci in questa guerra. La ragione fu il suo successo nel costruire una nuova economia crescente. Le radici della guerra furono l’invidia, l’avidità e la paura.”»
- Generale J. P. C. Fuller, storico della Seconda Guerra Mondiale
«Abbiamo fatto di Hitler un mostro, un demonio. Sicché non abbiamo potuto sconfessare questo dopo la guerra. Dopotutto, avevamo mobilitato le masse contro il diavolo in persona. Così siamo stati obbligati a recitare la nostra parte in questo scenario diabolico dopo la guerra. In nessun modo potevamo dire al nostro popolo che la guerra era solo una misura economica preventiva.»
- James Baker, sottosegretario agli Esteri USA, 1992
Quando la Storia ti viene imposta per legge, allora sta certo: è una menzogna......
"Ogni individuo ha diritto alla libertà di opinione e di espressione, incluso il diritto di non essere molestato per la propria opinione e quello di cercare, riceve e diffondere informazioni e idee attraverso ogni mezzo e senza riguardo a frontiere."
- Articolo 19 della Dichiarazione Universale dei Diritti Umani
“Per sapere chi regna su di voi, semplicemente scoprite chi non vi è permesso di criticare.”
Infatti, quello sopra e quello che segue sono solo la punta dell'iceberg, ma possono servire come introduzione all'argomento dell'Olocausto per coloro che insistono sulla logica, la scienza e la razionalità, invece delle fantasie e supposizioni di sempliciotti, imbroglioni, bugiardi, sfruttatori, esibizionisti, opportunisti e quelli che semplicemente cercano l'attenzione degli altri.......
Vari saggi da autori diversi, tra cui il noto storico revisionista italiano ed uomo di logica, Carlo Mattogno. (Tutti in italiano.)
“Camera a Gas: Mito o Realtà?” (un'intervista al Prof. Robert Faurisson)
Le Vittorie del Revisionismo da Robert Faurisson
Il Ventesimo Anniversario del Grande Processo Dell'Olocausto di Michael Hoffman
'Lo Zyklon B e le camere di disinfestazione tedesche' di Jurgen Graf
Il Rapporto Leuchter. Il noto rapporto peritale di Fred Leuchter, specialista americano di camere a gas di esecuzione (in certi stati degli Stati Uniti la pena di morte esiste ancora), della sua esaminazione sul posto in Polonia delle presunte camere a gas omicide nazionalsocialiste. Egli conferma che le cosiddette 'camere a gas' in questione non erano state utilizzate per gasare nessuno e non avrebbero potuto esserlo.
Il Revisionismo Olocaustico in Italiano. (Vari libri e saggi di autori diversi – grande collezione)
“L'ultima Battaglia” di Jurgen Graf
“Arcivescovo Williamson sulla frode dell'Olocausto.” (Un sacerdote della Chiesa Vera, finora coraggioso e risoluto, nonostante persecuzioni. Sottotitoli in italiano)
“Robert Faurisson, "Il problema delle camere a gas".” (francese, doppiato in italiano)
“La verità dietro i cancelli di Auschwitz - David Cole.” (Documentarista ebraico, David Cole, svela le menzogna di Auschwitz. Sottotitoli in italiano.)
Hitler Per 49 Volte Chiese La Pace Ma! (Una breve lezione di Storia reale da Dott. Gianpaolo Pucciarelli.)
Robert Faurisson - Un Uomo, di Paul-Eric Blanrue (sottotitoli italiani)
La Conoscenza rende Liberi (Attenzione : Solo per gli adulti. Il video contiene immagini di guerra e violenza che possono disturbare alcuni spettatori, persino adulti.)
*Altra lettura consigliata*
“Nessuno è così disperatamente schiavo, come coloro che credono erroneamente che sono liberi. La verità è stata allontanata dalla profondità della loro mente da capi che li governano con le bugie. Li nutrono di falsità fino a far sembrare sbagliato come giusto nei loro occhi.”
Vengono utilizzati i vostri desideri per controllarvi e rendervi schiavi? Cliccate qui per l'articolo "L'inganno Sesso (Una guida per gli uomini giovani.)"
Siamo gli schiavi inconsapevoli di una mano nascosta? Cliccate qui per l'articolo “La Trappola Denaro: Devo essere schiavo del denaro?” Lettura essenziale per veri amanti di libertà.......
Il tempo come arma di guerra. Una guerra segreta, non dichiarata e vigliacca. Un crimine atroce contro l'umanità. Nuvole artificiali e tossiche. Guardate e vedrete.....Si sta verificando in tutto il mondo, anche qui in Italia. Cliccate qui per il che, il perchè e il che cosa. Oppure cercate “Scie Chimiche Geelong” su Google.
“La Psichiatria: La Scienza o La Frode?” Sono scienziati veri gli psichiatri, oppure polizioti di pensiero? Che ne dite? Un articolo breve ma essenziale per coloro che vogliono capire la minaccia e la guerra contro la libertà di pensiero che affrontiamo in questi giorni - ecco il viso vero della psichiatria......
Psychiatry: Science or Fraud?
Recent article: "The Denial of Common Sense: Hollywood Jewry in Damage Control"
1. The Greatest Swindle of All Time.
In war, truth is the first casualty.......
Consider the following quotations from Professor Norman Finkelstein, well-known Jewish-American political scientist and author of “The Holocaust Industry”. Keep in mind that Professor Finkelstein's parents were prisoners at Auschwitz and Majdanek and both survived the war:
"The Holocaust may yet turn out to be the greatest robbery in the history of mankind."
"Much of the literature on Hitler's Final Solution is worthless as scholarship. Indeed, the field of Holocaust studies is replete with nonsense if not sheer fraud."
"Given the nonsense that is turned out daily by the Holocaust industry, the wonder is that there are so few skeptics."
For the facts gentlemen, not the Hollywood production click here.
"None are so hopelessly enslaved, as those who falsely believe they are free. The truth has been kept from the depth of their minds by masters who rule them with lies. They feed them on falsehoods till wrong looks like right in their eyes."
2. Are we the unwitting slaves of a hidden hand?
Click here for the article 'Do I Need to be a Slave to Money? (Applying the Scientific Method to the question of Liberty.)'
3. Are your desires being used to control and enslave you?
Click here for the article 'The Sex Deception (A Young Man's Guide.)'