Suggested Online Information Sources
The reference material listed below is just the tip of the iceberg. Please keep in mind that there is quite a lot of nonsense online too and it is often mixed in with the facts (sometimes deliberately), so keep your critical faculties active while you sort the wheat from the chaff, so to speak.
One example of this (more so a couple of years ago than now) was the mixing in of a whole lot of UFO nonsense with the chemtrails Geelong information - this is a textbook "intelligence" services disinformation exercise, do not be misled by it. Chemtrails have nothing to do with UFOs from outer space, though the actual criminal perpetrators would like us to believe so for obvious reasons. (Videos that turn up on You Tube have not necessarily been posted when they say they have - keep that in mind too.) Have no doubt about this whatsoever: chemtrails are the work of very much earth based jet aircraft acting out the orders of very much earth based cheats and liars. To believe otherwise is simply to be diverted from the truth - while we are busy chasing non-existent ETs and UFOs and other smoke and mirror effects from the "intelligence" services' bag of tricks, we are missing the real crime (which is a war crime) and its actual perpetrators (whose inhumanity is not so much a physical condition as a moral one), right before our very eyes. They are hoping we are the idiots they think we are. In fact they are staking everything on that. Let's disappoint them, shall we?
It is regrettable that there is so much disinformation online, but remember this – online you have at least a chance of getting the facts, if you keep your own brain turned on – but you won't get anything at all from mainstream outlets of information except misguidance and misdirection.
And that's a fact
For the article (in pdf) "Back To Word of Mouth – Powerful Interactive Learning versus Sophisticated Mind Control" click here.
For the article (in pdf) "Relating to Reality (And its importance to psychological soundness)" click here.
For the in depth article (in pdf) "The Sex Deception (A Young Man's Guide)" click here.
For the article "The Money Trap: Do I Need To Be A Slave To Money? (Applying the Scientific Method to the Question of Freedom)" click here.
Wigington is intelligent and articulate and feels keenly the super-critical nature of the "hole-in-the-boat"/"house-on-fire" geo-engineering issue; all of which make him a compelling and edifying communicator. Some of his recent presentations/talks in which he discusses the ongoing and criminally senseless exacerbation of an already bad geo-climate situation, by hare-brained climate engineering schemes, are must-sees.
Geoengineering. A Clear and Present Danger
Geoengineering and the Collapse of Earth
Dane Wigington in Sacramento - Is Climate Engineering decimating or weather?
Note: Wigington prefers the scientific communities' terms "stratospheric aerosol geo-engineering (SAG)" and "solar radiation management (SRM)", or even just simply "geo-engineering" and "climate engineering", to the popular layman's term "chemtrails", explaining that the latter is being deliberately associated online and elsewhere with the dismissive trigger-words "conspiracy theory" and associated ideas of insubstantial speculation and unsound thought.
Perhaps too though, we ought to keep in mind that the scientific community is the problem; it is after all the scientific community that has given us chemtrails and geo-engineering technology in the first place, and that is now a part of the criminal failure to disclose to the public the truth about their deployment, not to mention the pack of lies we are offered in place of the truth. It seems to me that our conditioned habit of equating the scientific community and their works and public statements with something akin to religious authority and gospel truth is part of the problem we now face psychologically regarding this issue, viz. our apparent inability to use our own eyes and minds to perceive the obvious. Clearly the distinction needs to be made in the collective mind between sound scientific principles available essentially to all (that is, objective inference from observation), and mere theory, rhetoric and lies that use the abstract idea of science and associated credibility as a convenient smokescreen.
Three clips of Allan Spencer's video footage of flights identified as Qantas flights QF63 and QF64 dumping on Greater Geelong.
“Chemtrail Terrorism over Geelong”
“Chemtrail and HAARP Terrorism over Geelong. 14th Oct. 2012”
“Chemtrails and HAARP Terrorism over Geelong 3rd Sept,2012”
A Kuala Lumpur to Christchurch flight hundreds of kilometres off it's usual shortest route course dumping it's chemical junk on unsuspecting Geelong people. Note the stop-start chemtrail indicative of an on/off mechanism - condensation trails, by definition, do not stop and start abruptly: “Air Asia Stop_Start Chemtrail over Geelong.”
Click here for a clip taken in the Northern Territory showing two planes in more or less the same sky space, one making an ordinary contrail, the other making something else entirely. There goes the absurd government/ASA "atmospheric conditions" explanation.......
For an excellent collection of high quality photographs of aerosols and derivative artificial cloud formations in the skies above Port Macquarie, NSW, and elsewhere around Australia and the world, visit BlueNoMore.com. The website author is an experienced pilot and, and in addition to the revealing photographs, provides interesting insight and technical information about the types of non-commercial military jets being used for chemtrail operations as well as mission-specific modifications, such as engine silencing.
He is perhaps now most well known in his native Canada, and particularly his own province of British Columbia (BC), for leading the successful fight (beginning in 2009) against the unpopular HST tax that the then Campbell government was seeking to steamroll through the parliament over people's heads. (Sound familiar?) Vander Zalm and his team succeeded in getting sufficient numbers on petitions for the matter to go to a referendum where a majority voted to abolish the HST.
In 2013 the former BC Premier decided to put some much needed weight behind the people's fight against chemtrails.
"My wife Lillian's been bugging me about this", he explained in an interview with Press for Truth in August 2013, "she watches the sky and she sees what obviously aren't contrails. I don't think there's anybody that has looked at the sky with a bit of brains, and thought in fairness, that could argue that something isn't happening that wasn't happening before. Contrails were something that followed the trail..... from an airplane, that were narrow and dissipated very quickly. Chemtrails go from horizon to horizon and they spread, and they criss-cross and they go next to one another and pretty soon the whole sky is cloudy." (1)
At around the same time, in an interview with Sheila Zilinsky (2), Vander Zalm pointed out the underlying factor that tied together chemtrails and other issues such as the HST (Harmonising Sales Tax) he helped to defeat, and the introduction of so-called 'Smart meters' world-wide for example, viz. the continual effort by government to side step the will and concerns of the people in issues that affect their lives in fundamental ways; ways that make the people's lack of input and/or the lack of any consideration of the people's welfare by government regarding same issues, not acceptable.
"I think the people are being left out of the process", the Premier-turned-Activist told Press for Truth, "Government has lost complete contact with the people. It's a mess. And the average person out there, if you asked him, "Do you really trust the government?", they'll say, 'No!', a whole lot of them, a large percentage....I think a lot of people have lost their trust in government, which is really sad, because the government is supposed to be there to represent the people. They're elected to do things on our behalf and to communicate with us. That's all gone." (1)
To Zilinsky he added:
"I can recall when I started in politics and that's now going back 40 years or so, when I started in politics the pay was alright, but it was relatively modest. Today politicians receive pretty big pay, lots of benefits and good pensions so therefore there is a tendency for the politicians to perhaps not be as outspoken on issues for fear that it might cost them their position within the political party that they represent, so it's very different from what it used to be........so the cost of government is so enormous and people are really fighting more to stay in there for the benefit of what it is they've been getting by way of indemnities and benefits and pensions than what it is to represent the people and the voice of the people." (2)
And in what appears to be a thinly veiled reference to underhanded tactics and abuses of power in politics (such as the media's misuse of their enormous influence on public opinion to 'remove' politicians found to be troublesome to controlling business and power interests), Vander Zalm raised, again to Zilinsky, what must surely be cause for some alarm to discerning readers/listeners when one considers his former political rank and experience:
"I wanted to get out of politics, which I did, because I realized that unless you play the game you can be removed fairly quickly, there's [sic] ways that it can be done, so I got out of politics, and I did get involved in issues..." (2)
Regarding chemtrails, the former BC Premier's approach was straight forward and direct - a freedom of information inquiry was sent to the Canadian federal government and the provincial government of British Columbia, and at the same time an explanatory letter containing a related recommendation was sent to all local governments in the BC province.
"Both the provincial government and the federal government must know what [chemtrails] is", he explained, "You can't go up there and spray
something in the sky, or do something in the sky, or move in the sky for that matter without getting permission through the governments. So they have to know what's happening. So I made this request of both the provincial and the federal government to advise me what information they have within government or within any of their ministries about climate control programs, because that's what I guessed it to be, and that's what most people think it to be if they're looking at this and analysing this a little more carefully than just a glance." (2)
".....I passed [the chemtrail letter] on to every municipality city and regional district in our province with a request that they pass a resolution to say that no particulate matter for climate control be sprayed in the atmosphere above their jurisdiction without informed consent. Now I know , having been at the local level in government, having been a councillor and a mayor, that's pretty hard for some council member or a mayor or a council to say, you know, we're not going to do this, this is crazy. Because it's not an unreasonable request...Who in their jurisdiction wouldn't want the council to say that no particulate matter be sprayed in their atmosphere above them, without having some knowlege of what it is and getting consent?" (2)
That was 2013. What has happened since then as a result of Vander Zalm's efforts?
Well, the short answer is that chemtrails and geo-engineering are still ongoing in British Columbia, Canada and the world, just like here in Australia. Nonetheless, Vander Zalm has succeeded in lending his highly credible voice to the ongoing battle against the chemtrail atrocity worldwide, while providing an example of an intelligent and common sense approach to dealing with government regarding it. The evasion, delay, misdirection and scoff tactics of government, beauraucracy and media that inevitably follows from such an approach serves to increasingly enlighten people as to the dire need we all have for a complete overhaul and reform of present governmental systems so that something like representation of the people's real welfare might take their place.
It is long overdue.
"I think people have to become more involved", concluded Vander Zalm in August 2013, "If you don't want to be led down the garden path, if you don't want to end up being totally controlled, you better get involved now....." (1)
*The quotations and information in the article ("Bill Vander Zalm takes on Chemtrails") above are taken from the following two interviews given by Vander Zalm in August 2013:
1) Chemtrails And Geoengineering (with former Premier of BC Bill Vander Zalm) - Press for Truth (From minute 7:00)
2) Bill Vander Zalm to Sheila Zilinsky ('Weekend Vigilante').
See also "The Goddard Report".
Vander Zalm discusses his freedom of information inquiry to federal and provincial governments, and letter to local governments here and here.
Vander Zalm discusses the response to his 2013 inquiries and requests to government here.
You may also wish to read the well known book about declassified weather modification and mind control technology:
“Angels Don't Play This HAARP” by Dr. Nick Begich and Jeane Manning (1997).
You can download this as a pdf document here.
Here is another: "Nick Begich : Technology to Control the Weather"
For suspected Australian HAARP-type technology locations click here.
(Too bad if we missed it though!)
The Queensland government requested access to Thai rain-making technology in 2009 with an "agreement" being reached about a year later in June 2010. How many flood-affected Queenslanders know that? Click here for the Sydney Morning Herald story.
Had there been trials or demonstrations in the interim? And what use of the technology exactly has been applied since? If I were a Queensland flood victim these are questions I'd be insisting on getting the answers to. And what about the Victorian floods of late 2010 and early 2011.....?
"....Environment Minister Malcolm Turnbull bet $10 million taxpayers' dollars, plus $1 million GST he could make it rain, even when there are no clouds. He did so by bankrolling research into a mysterious ionisation technology promoted by the Australian Rain Corporation.
"Electrification of the ionosphere to create clouds out of thin air. Certainly sounds a lot like the secret Australian rain device - no photographs allowed - that so excited the Minister and those who will share his six-month $10 million research funding....."
- Greg Hoy for the ABC's 7.30 Report aired 19/11/2007. See below for links.
In 2007, 10 million dollars were granted by the Australian Government to a company part owned by Rupert Murdoch's nephew, Matt Handbury, to trial Russian-developed "rain making" technology in Queensland. (Consider that state's often disastrous rainfall since then.)
In the 7.30 report story cited above, ABC reporter, Greg Hoy together with a physicist from the ANU, Neville Fletcher, and a representative of the old cloud seeding technology industry, Ian Searle, seem a little sceptical of the new technology. In light of more recent developments, however, I think it fair to say that Goldman Sachs man Turnbull and his electorate benefactor, Handbury, may have known something back in 2007 that Hoy and co didn't.
Curiously enough, among the apparent sceptics were a couple of representatives of Israel; no explanation is given for the relevance of their particular input for a story ostensibly dealing with a Russian technology being tested in Australia, but frankly I wouldn't be betting anything on the fact that they were representing themselves entirely honestly to an Australian reporter for the ABC. Perhaps Hoy and the ABC had missed the real significance of the story they were investigating, just like they were supposed to.......
For the 7.30 Report Story on the ABC click here (for the transcript) and here (for the video).
Actually the story was first reported by Tanya Nolan for "The World Today" program on ABC local radio on the 24th October 2007:
"It's a technique developed in Russia in the last decade, and it involves sending electrical charges into the atmosphere to make clouds and ultimately rain."
A further article from Anna Salleh of the ABC (click here) asked the question in November 2007 if clouds can be made "from scratch", stating that the Australian Rain Corporation technology was being tested to see if it could "make new rain clouds from blue skies by generating ions in the atmosphere...[using] a ground-based device to [thus] attract water molecules."
Perhaps we could pose here an additional question: aside from any application for enhancement (or denial) of rainfall, could this technology have found a further or different "use" altogether, independent of and/or in conjunction with the use of chemtrails, to create and/or expand cloud formation, thus denying sunlight to targeted areas for long term psychological warfare purposes and other strategic criminal/defence force type applications - such as solar energy denial for instance?
"In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels." (Executive Summary, pg. vii)
"While most weather-modification efforts rely on the existence of certain preexisting conditions, it may be possible to produce some weather effects artificially, regardless of preexisting conditions....Nanotechnology also offers possibilities for creating simulated weather. A cloud, or several clouds, of microscopic computer particles, all communicating with each other and with a larger control system could provide tremendous capability. Interconnected, atmospherically buoyant, and having navigation capability in three dimensions, such clouds could be designed to have a wide-range of properties. They might exclusively block optical sensors or could adjust to become impermeable to other surveillance methods. They could also provide an atmospheric electrical potential difference, which otherwise might not exist, to achieve precisely aimed and timed lightning strikes. Even if power levels achieved were insufficient to be an effective strike weapon, the potential for psychological operations in many situations could be fantastic." (Chapter 4 "Artificial Weather", pg.27) [Emphasis mine.]
I think it safe to assume that the US air force and other "defence"/criminal, megalomaniacal and paranoiac organizations the world over, including Australia of course, have realized now much of the "potential" outlined in the above-cited US air force document of 1996, for all kinds of objectives and for "both domestic and international applications" as it so brazenly puts it. Obviously.
(For more on the use of "PsyOps" in Greater Geelong click here.)
Finally the air force document discusses what in PsyOps terminology is known as "plausible deniability" (that's just plain bare-faced, sneaky and cowardly lying to the rest of us) and also the "costs", particularly of nanotechnology weather warfare (eg. chemtrails):
"One major advantage of using simulated weather to achieve a desired effect is that unlike other approaches, it makes what are otherwise the results of deliberate actions appear to be the consequences of natural weather phenomena. In addition, it is potentially relatively inexpensive to do. According to J. Storrs Hall, a scientist at Rutgers University conducting research on nanotechnology, production costs of these nanoparticles could be about the same price per pound as potatoes. This of course discounts research and development costs, which will be primarily borne by the private sector and be considered a sunk cost by 2025 and probably earlier." (Chapter 4 "Artificial Weather", pg.28)
As is usual when reading defence force documents a fair amount of translation is required into the plain language of decent human beings. Research and development costs borne by the private sector means the tax-payer of course, that is government funding/subsidising of private companies - Australian Rain Corporation for example. (Who bore the 10 million dollar cost for trials and development there?) Apparently it is not enough that psychopaths posing as our "defence" forces are poisoning/flooding the general populace, or otherwise manipulating their weather without their consent, the victims are also required to pay for the "privilege". Of course the "private sector" companies keep all the ill-begotten profits resulting from said development for themselves, profits that come out of tax payer funded defence budgets for example. Zero risk. Big business as usual in other words. Note also that when defence force organizations discuss "costs" they generally mean monetary cost, human cost being something completely outside the scope of their understanding or consideration, except perhaps in so far as corpses and other casualties impact their objectives with regards the former.
Rosalind Peterson, Environmental Impact Analyst, Independent Researcher and founder of "California Skywatch", proposes the question "How do you like your skies? Natural or man-made?" to the 2007 UN session on so-called global warming, stating further that persistent contrails (chemtrails) form man-made clouds that are "trapping warmth in the atmosphere, exacerbating global warming." Which of course puts utter lie to any claims that chemtrails have some kind of benevolent geoengineering mitigating purpose regarding global warming.
http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org is Rosalind's website including California Skywatch.
Actually Rosalind prefers the term "persistent contrails" to "chemtrails" saying that "chemtrails" are immediately written off as a hoax by officials, without investigation, as a part of their very protocol. Her own investigations have been thorough and methodical and her explanation of them
easy to follow for non-specialist listeners. Covered in this presentation:
- Chemtrails/persistent contrails can cover the sky with solid cloud cover in about 3 hours.
- NASA encouraged school children to count "persistent contrails" in what seemed to be some kind of conditioning exercise.
- Weather reporters can see the trails and their effects on satellites as they are happening but report them falsely as weather fronts nonetheless.
- From 1990 drinking water in California began showing spikes in certain months and certain years all at the same time for metals such as Arsenic, Aluminium, Barium, Strontium, Manganese, Calcium and Magnesium. Interestingly the first five of these are among the chemicals found in anomalously high quantities in Queenslander Edward Everett's rainwater sample taken in 2010 during a period of intense observed chemtrail activity. (See the report here.)
- Children in California and the US are increasingly suffering from rickets, a bone disease resulting from sunlight deficiency.
- Weather modification is currently being conducted all over the world including Australia without any kind of public or agricultural oversight or consent.
For an in depth investigation into the use of chemtrails and weather modification technology in the fossil fuel power structure's war against the solar industry click here.
The article below is intended as a supplement to 'The War Against Solar' Page and addresses doubts some may have about greenhouse gases emitted during the solar panel (PV) production process.
No, it does not. Not by a long shot.
Consider the table below, published just last year by the IPCC showing lifecycle emissions from various electricity supply technologies:
What is important to understand is that though the production of solar panels may result in the emission of some ultra-potent greenhouse gases, the relatively small quantities emitted and the long energy producing lifetime of the panels means that the CO2 emission equivalent per kWh produced (gCO2e/kWh) over the lifetime of the panels is still relatively low. Far lower than coal even when newly developed CCS technology is deployed. And cleaner still is Concentrated Solar Thermal technology which is, according to the IPCC data, up to 30 times cleaner than coal generated electricity without CO2 capture and sequester (CCS), and up to 8 times cleaner even when CCS is factored in.
What the two sets of data above mean, perhaps, is that we should be careful not to be carried away by superficial and possibly misleading facts, such as the ultra-greenhouse effect potency of some of the gases emitted by solar PV production, but rather see the whole picture, and the whole effect (in this case, for instance, the relative quantities), before forming our conclusions......
- Bob Carr, The Diary of a Foreign Minister, 2014
Note: Bob Carr is speaking specifically from his experience with the Gillard and Rudd Labour governments, but do you think Goldman-Sachs man Malcolm 'Turncoat' Turnbull's Liberal government is any less a lackey to the corporate-owned mass media, the big Anglo-Australian fossil fuel and mineral corporations, the banks and Israel? For proof of Malcolm Turnbull's direct involvement (along with Rupert Murdoch's nephew Matt Handbury) in the development of artificial cloud cover technology in Australia click here. To learn how artificial cloud cover technology is being applied in the war against solar energy click here.
The reader will have to make his own investigations into who is responsible for the vile crime against humanity and sick grab for/clinging to power that is chemtrails and geoengineering in Australia and world-wide. I would only point out that we are dealing here with the deployment of a technology as a military weapon, in black operations (including psy-ops) targeting individuals, groups or nations opposed to perpetrator goals. Among these black operations is the deployment of artificial cloud cover technology as a weapon against the renewable energy threat to the fossil fuel paradigm. Since the military takes its orders ultimately from the government, and since the public is being deliberately excluded (by secrecy and disinformation) from the decision-making process regarding the deployment of said technology, it follows that we are interested here with the question of who or what is guiding, influencing or manipulating government (military) policy behind the scenes, with regard to weather modification technology. In other words we are dealing with diverse perpetrator groups whose interests are not necessarily the same, but can nevertheless somewhat intersect at times, and who are more or less supra-govermental in nature. I think we can make some further deductions about these perpetrator groups from a few simple common sense observations.
The fact, for instance, that prices of goods in Australia have almost doubled in the space of just a few years (despite misleading inflation figures that attempt to belie the obvious fact) is indicative of vast amounts of money being printed by the central banking system for projects not revealed to the public. The implementation of vast weather modification schemes fits this profile exactly. Such a method of financing these projects, by the way, is of course nothing more than a clandestine form of taxation since the devaluation of our money is the price we pay. So, yes, to add insult to injury, we are also paying for the constant shower of toxins on our largely unwitting heads day in and day out.
There are a couple of highly pernicious symbiotic international relationships we should also consider. Firstly, there is the one between international bankers and the fossil fuel industry, since the ability of the former to extract their proverbial 'pound of flesh' from the latter, that is, interest and principal on gigantic loans, depends on the necessary continuity of the latter. Secondly, and perhaps most significantly, there is Israel's reqiurement that Western powers, and particularly America, maintain a stake in Middle Eastern fossil fuel supply since Israel's geo-political relevance depends entirely on the Western Powers' perceived dependence on Israel as a strategic ally and military base in that region.
So, keeping all of the above in mind, with regards chemtrails, geo-engineering and weather modification, I think we have enough to formulate more than a rough idea of what is going on here and who is behind it.
In any case it would appear that it is the the same malignant, lying spirit driving them all; the whole business is, after all, based on a pack of lies. And when the time comes, in a desperate attempt to save itself, no doubt that same malignant spirit will betray them all.
As for the rest of us, we were betrayed by our so-called leaders a long time ago.
"Well the other state governments have vested interests in maintaining the status quo. They collect the royalties from the coal mines; they collect the dividends from the coal-fired generators; they own these assets. And, they are not interested in disrupting that business model, even though that's locking consumers into higher energy costs over the medium to long term."
- Simon Corbell, ACT Minister for Energy, to Stephen Long of the ABC's Four Corners program in July 2014
“If we look to the whole change [the shift to clean tech solar from dirty fossil fuel] then you can immediately recognise that this a totally new paradigm. And then you can imagine how many conflicts happen, happened and will happen, because it leads to the dissolution of the conventional energy economy. Automatically. The primary energy economy will disappear. Because it is impossible to change from being a seller of coal; gas, uranium and coal, to the role of seller of solar radiation and wind. It's impossible. Wind and solar radiation is a common good. Not owned by anyone. And this is the largest, the most....the conventional primary energy sector is the most influential, with the highest turnover, the most influential part of the world economy. And then you can imagine the dimension of the conflict which happens. They will disappear. They become superfluous. Automatically. Therefore they have the interest to postpone it. They know their own end, but they want to postpone it. For decades. And we cannot accept that, because society, the world cannot wait to the point when the last drop of oil is consumed, or the last cubic metre of gas or the last tonne of uranium or coal – we cannot wait for that.”
“[Governments] feel themselves and they act as partners and assistants of the conventional [fossil fuel] power structure. This has many reasons. Some believe that there would be no alternative. They believe the arguments. Others are very closely linked, personally linked with the power companies and in different ways of corruption. The most comfortable way to corrupt a politician is the method, the legal method, to pay them later. After office.....after leaving government, then hiring him for the board, and this is a very popular, very usable way of let's say legalised corruption, and the thinking of all governments that they are dependent [on] the work of the energy supplier because no economy can work without energy, and the monopole of the conventional power, even in the thinking that there would be no alternative, this monopole gave them so much influence.....that many governments are puppets...in the hand of these power companies.”
- Dr Hermann Scheer, German Parliamentarian, Solar advocate and activist par excellence
- Maxim of the house of Rothschild and central bankers in general.
"No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or he will hold to the one, and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon."
- Lord Jesus Christ, Luke 16:13
“The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.”
- Benjamin Disraeli 1844, UK Prime Minister 1868, 1874 - 1880
“....all those in the democratic circles of America and Europe.....know well by now that the disastrous attack [of 9/11] was planned and executed by the American CIA and [the Israeli] Mossad with the help of the Zionist world so as to put the blame on the Arab countries and induce the Western powers to intervene in Iraq and in Afghanistan.”
- President Emeritus of the Italian Republic, Francesco Cossiga to the “Corriera Della Sera” (Italy's oldest and most widely read newspaper), 2007
Click here for the full article (in Italian only). For the most insightful documentary ever made about what really happened on 9/11 click here.
“September 11 was a godsend for Israel. It could now conjoin its merciless persecution of the Palestinians with Bush's War against Terror.”
- Professor Norman Finkelstein, Jewish-American political scientist and author, October, 2008
“The media's the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that's power. Because they control the minds of the masses.”
- Malcolm X, from a 1963 speech
"As for the petty little world of journalism, the media demonstrates how it, more than anyone, is careful to traffic only in authorized ideas and wares; while at the same time it fosters, through its antics, the illusion of a free circulation of ideas and opinions - not unlike jesters in a tyrant's court."
- Professor Robert Faurisson, The Adventure of Revisionism, September 1993
"Behold, I will bring of the synagogue of Satan, who say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie. Behold, I will make them to come and adore before thy feet. And they shall know that I have loved thee."
- Apocalypse 3:9
"To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."
"Here, then, we have a class of men [Freemasons] sworn, under most frightful penalties, to espouse the cause of a companion so far as to extricate him from any difficulty, to the extent of their power, whether he is right or wrong. How can such a man be safely intrusted with any office connected with the administration of the law?
"What shall we say to, what shall we do with, these men who swarm in every part of this country, and who are thus banded together to espouse each other's cause and to extricate each other from any difficulty, whether they are right or wrong, to conceal each other's crimes, to vote each other into office, and the like? Can wholesome society continue to exist under the influence of such an institution as this? "
- Rev. Charles Finney in "The Character, Claims and Practical Workings Of Freemasonry", 1869
“An antisemite used to be someone who hates Jews; nowadays an antisemite is someone Jews hate.”
- Gilad Atzmon, Jewish musician and author, 2011
"[Israel] is a vandal state.....Israel is Genghis Khan with a computer."
"...sometimes I feel that Israel has come out of the boils of the hell, a satanic state."
- Professor Norman Finkelstein, Jewish-American political scientist and author, 2009
"I think party donations and a program of giving trips to MPs and journalists to Israel.....it needs to be highlighted because I think it reached a very unhealthy level.”
“It’s an appalling situation if Australia allows a group of [Jewish] businessmen [in Melbourne] to veto policy on the Middle East.”*
- Bob Carr, interview with Sarah Ferguson (ABC), and *excerpt from 'The Diary of a Foreign Minister', 2014
Click here for the transcript of the Sarah Ferguson interview. Or here for the video.
Left: Two sides of politics, but both Bob Carr and Malcolm Fraser have publicly acknowledged the inappropriate and disproportionate power wielded by the Jewish community lobby in Australian politics.........
Consider the following excerpt from Zionist gatekeeper Jon Faine's interview with Malcolm Fraser in 2014:
Jon Faine (ABC): Bob Carr has managed to upset a lot of people here in Australia and overseas with his memoir, saying that he thought that the pro-Israel, in particular Jewish community lobby in Australia wielded too much power. What does Malcolm Fraser think of that?
Malcolm Fraser: They certainly do.....The Jewish community seeks to get Australia to support policies as defined by Israel.
- Malcolm Fraser, 'The Conversation Hour' (ABC), May 2014
Click here for an mp3 of the full interview (Note that the part referring to pro-Israel lobby influence starts at around the 45 minute mark.)
Israeli Deceptions Go South: Ex-Australian Prime Minister Confirms Israel Attacked America
Israel's Apologists: Anthony Lawson exposes the ABC's Zionist Gatekeeper Jon Faine
The results are summarised below. The black text is verbatim from the report. The blue and green text is some sorely needed common sense commentary sadly lacking from said report.
What the ATSB found
The Monash University Institute of Railway Technology (IRT) carried out an analysis of four rail sections [allegedly] removed from the derailment site and, for comparison purposes, one section of 80 lb/yd rail from a stockpile at Kulgera, Northern Territory.
On the basis of above said analysis:
The ATSB found the train had derailed on a section of 80 lb/yd rail, while travelling over a flash-butt welded joint that had fractured through a pre-existing defect in the rail foot. The defect most likely occurred during the flash-butt welding process [about 30 years ago], which subsequently led to crack propagation and brittle fracture that extended vertically through the rail web.
Whose word do we have for it that all the rail sections allegedly taken from the derailment site were indeed what they purported to be? Do we trust these people? I don't. We know from the report that there was a stockpile of similar rail sections in nearby Kulgera. Analysis of the section taken randomly from said stockpile suggested that probably a significant number had very convenient and suggestive weld defects ready to go. Nice and handy......
Metallurgical evidence indicated that the fracture had propagated slowly from the initiating defect and had likely been in existence for some time, remaining undetected during track inspections and the passage of trains for a period up to 30 years.
This nonsense is completely at odds with ultrasonic testing of the weld only eight months prior to the derailment. (See below.)
The last track inspection from a locomotive cab before the derailment was on 3 June 2014, where the only defects reported were two track signage issues. Other inspections of this type carried out on 23 July 2013, 20 December 2013 and 25 March 2014 identified various items including rough riding, mud-hole, ballasting and some dip welds. No defects indicating or suggesting rail or track deficiencies were reported through locomotive cabin inspections in the vicinity of the PoD [Point of Derailment].
GWA records showed that track at the1036.541 km mark had been tamped* in September 2013 with a detailed track geometry inspection carried out shortly after (October 2013). About four months later, in February 2014, another detailed track geometry inspection was carried out. No track defects were recorded at or near the PoD.
A second before disaster: a video camera on the lead locomotive captures this extraordinary shot of the sabotaged rail track a moment before impact. Note the prominent position of the so-called “displaced ballast”. Does that look like gravel to you?
*Tamping is the process by which ballast is packed around the sleepers of a track to ensure the correct alignment for the location, speed and curvature of the line.
Speno advised that a defect of 9.0 mm (or greater) would normally produce a defect alarm, thereby prompting a manual ultrasonic test of the suspected defect. In this case an alarm had not been generated, suggesting that the automatic system assessed the defect as falling below the defined alarm limit.
In other words, state-of-the-art ultra-sonic testing of the rail, by an independent third party, at exactly the point of derailment and only 8 months prior to the derailment, found no cause for even the lowest priority caution of monitor and optional removal within 30 days.
Detection of Rail Defects
As would be expected for an increase in sensitivity of the instrument, the new test found more defects, a seemingly impressive accomplishment until you consider that, in fact, all but four needed either no further action at all or needed only further monitoring for possible future action. And of the four "high priority" defects identified, two had been identified previously by the inspection of November 2013. Regarding these latter two there is nothing to indicate any significant change in actual results but only in the subjective appraisal of them - going from low priority to a higher one in the August testing. Even then no immediate removal/repair was recommended for three out of four of these so-called “high priority” defects, but only “more frequent monitoring and reassessment”. As for the one that needed immediate repair, that's where the natural progression theory really starts to break down.
“a defect similar to that which precipitated the derailment.....” [The most obvious explanation for it not being detected in the November test, that is, it simply wasn't there, is again incredibly overlooked.]
"another broken rail at the 975.244 km mark, which had also fractured through a flash-butt weld at a defect in the foot area. [Oh yes, that ubiquitous “defect in the foot area” again.....We are not told the details of any analysis of the condition of any sample purporting to be this second broken rail, or if indeed it had been analysed at all by the IRT. What is the basis for these conclusions?] In accordance with GWA’s procedures, the broken rail was repaired before the passage of the next train."
In other words, at the time of the derailment, there was a broken rail some 60 kms further down the line from the PoD that needed immediate repair before any train could pass over it without, presumably, derailing! What are the chances, (if we, like the ATSB, do not allow the possibility of deliberate sabotage shortly before derailment), of two rail sections 60 kms apart reaching naturally a critical condition at exactly the same time, some time between the passage of the previous train and the train that was derailed?
The report goes on to conclude that:
Now think, gentlemen, what would be the most reasonable conclusion arising from the fact that state-of-the-art ultrasonic testing of only 8 months prior to the derailment had failed to find even the lowest of priority of defects at either of the broken rail locations?
Even allowing for some error in the ultrasonic test results how likely would the test be not to detect at least something of flaws that, if we presuppose a natural progression (as does the ATSB), must have been “well advanced” by the time of the inspection?
In light of this, would it not be fair (not to mention thorough), to at least consider the possibility of sabotage?
Actually it could not be clearer:
The facts speak for themselves. Above (left and right): Two breaks in the the line 60 kms apart, both just happening to be in a critical or worse condition at exactly the same time, between the time of the derailment and, presumably, the passage of the previous train. Clearly the criminal vermin behind this cowardly act of terrorism, an act which put the lives of two drivers and those in the crew van at considerable risk, were leaving nothing to chance. If the first break failed, the second would do the job. Note the proximity of a service road entry point to the point of derailment. (See also below.)
Scene of the Crime. Above: Both breaks occurred in close proximity to service road entry points with access to the Stuart Highway. In this close up image from Google Earth it can be seen that the derailment point is a short distance from a very convenient service road entry point. The next nearest one is 12kms south near Marryat SA. The roads leading west and south west both lead back to the Stuart Highway.
"On this basis therefore, it was evident that the ultrasonic testing conducted in November 2013, as part of GWA’s scheduled maintenance processes, had been inefficient at detecting and/or appropriately assessing some internal rail defects in the 80 lb/yd rail between Northgate and Alice Springs."
Yes, clearly "evident"...... if you say so ATSB.......
The following articles have moved
"None are so hopelessly enslaved, as those who falsely believe they are free. The truth has been kept from the depth of their minds by masters who rule them with lies. They feed them on falsehoods till wrong looks like right in their eyes."